From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFRZ5-0006xm-CP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:01:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A487E0C2F; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C890E0C21 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from loonquawl.digimed.co.uk (loonquawl.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCA72E2944 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:00:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:00:51 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? Message-ID: <20080117100051.4777de2a@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <6142e6140801110037p7d5167c5y619b318ba1bf652e@mail.gmail.com> <1200041896.10339.13.camel@localhost> <20080111091237.GB12107@localhost> <1343558.gq7T5pozvP@michael-schmarck.my-fqdn.de> <20080111071549.4677caa8@osage.osagesoftware.com> <47876E63.3010009@bellsouth.net> <20080111143332.4ccf33de@grolsch.ajiaojr.net> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0cvs45 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Face: 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 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/P+WEI9yW9T6jrkREb_M1Odp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: e16b84b7-4f84-4fd5-8bbe-46fec95dbfef X-Archives-Hash: 9a7221744a9d27c95a92c24dba0bf976 --Sig_/P+WEI9yW9T6jrkREb_M1Odp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:19:48 +0000 (UTC), Thufir wrote: > Let's turn this around: if Gentoo were to attract a larger user base I=20 > posit that this would attract more developers. How do you draw that conclusion? How would attracting users who are unwilling to read documentation and get their hands dirty increase the number of potential developers? --=20 Neil Bothwick COMMAND: A suggestion made to a computer. --Sig_/P+WEI9yW9T6jrkREb_M1Odp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHjydTum4al0N1GQMRAmY1AKCfIe5dNBrBxzhObwVdhkGiv5lUyACfcDjJ Lcphq4s0sblmmcLMPC/FSrA= =39J6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/P+WEI9yW9T6jrkREb_M1Odp-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list