From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFCwO-0004lX-V6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:24:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D88F6E073F; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A708E077D for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so361507fga.14 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:19:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=jAm1kmOV14+Wv6al5+GduJqYolDORIMQ/C5InT9cBOs=; b=oEG9aVLam4qS8jVQAlBliuty2eOuU1vf8EVX4qMME44+2fIq/W6eo0OJGnkK6V3biOk04tGw+MHG/lvAOq/1M/HKIgCfJRg5Ku3XjX79O/EeRZExDrdaGkB/C54GyPNKpr5KeZSMyxsalIGrw9IS+ph3E1Vxy1AcKROgwBSJIXk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=bEBkZguJfBtSH4WEoF4uK/4DsTzIY0qbv0XUfs/qg2fpqsCQF3h37SNplk+QR/As1ZR0WU81PwWotmNx9EYS1wez8YHvgWWwfi0lt1U7qA5ysUrimQhv4b5lr5Zse8kj8ScksJYF6KLuQnXQVsL2ENnUn/xnae+gadFRUM9/7Bg= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr1982328buc.3.1200507568365; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:19:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.3? ( [41.243.201.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k9sm482969nfh.38.2008.01.16.10.19.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:19:27 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] DNAT not working Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1200254464.237318@rumba> <200801161423.38386.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <1200502164.953580@rumba> In-Reply-To: <1200502164.953580@rumba> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801162013.49843.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 15100fd7-a127-4e2a-9319-0b68ca97b7d0 X-Archives-Hash: e75f8a9a84a11c379f7a2a96c9ead4e9 On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote: > In <200801161423.38386.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> alan.mckinnon@gmail.com (Alan McKinnon) writes: > >Most likely he doesn't have the correct module loaded int he kernel > > As I said, the fact that iptables -L (after a fresh reboot) does not > do anything puzzles me a bit. What would be the right module in Your > opinion? Also is there a kernel configuration option I might have > overseen? nat needs the following config at least: Networking -> Networking Options -> Network packet filtering framework (Netfilter) -> IP: Netfilter Configuration -> Full NAT and the options below it the modules that load on my machine after running that same iptbales command are: xt_tcpudp 3712 1 iptable_nat 7812 1 nf_nat 20524 1 iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 18952 2 iptable_nat nf_conntrack 66376 3 iptable_nat,nf_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4 nfnetlink 6424 3 nf_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack ip_tables 14284 1 iptable_nat x_tables 15748 3 xt_tcpudp,iptable_nat,ip_tables alan -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list