From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JF0Ob-0005ML-KU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:01:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DF81E073C; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F365E070C for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013556563E for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.577 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.577 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.578, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58NJfrxQHhaS for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411F265B1B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JF0O1-0007JE-Nz for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:25 +0000 Received: from c98.sstar.com ([204.14.146.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:25 +0000 Received: from boxcars by c98.sstar.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:00:25 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?u1Gr?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:58:09 -0600 Organization: none Message-ID: <20080115225809.395ed95b@bellgrove.remarqs.net> References: <1200129071.4788842fc5816@imp.free.fr> <200801122217.44979.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <478A1B3D.5030900@bellsouth.net> <200801131523.23859.nagatoro@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c98.sstar.com X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 03114d79-b4a5-4728-a986-9ac20dc8bf66 X-Archives-Hash: 75f68956b722c5cd8e60fd2847744662 Naga Toro wrote: > That would be two a**holes in that discussion. If you read it you > would know that may devs tried to correct drobbins but that he > couldn't accept the fact that he wasn't the chief anymore and that > things have changed since he left. On the contrary, he never had trouble accepting the fact that he wasn't the chief. And if he hadn't clearly seen how things have changed, he wouldn't have left again. > I'm not sure that the best guy to run Gentoo is a guy who wants to be > THE chief and not one of the community. The community, with no strong leadership, hasn't done a very good job of moving Gentoo forward. I don't know that drobbins is the /best/ guy to run Gentoo, but I think he's the best one who's stepped forward, willing to give it a try. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list