From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEMU1-0007Fu-QU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:23:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91642E0E0B; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.cybercity.dk (smtp1.cybercity.dk [212.242.43.251]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E27E0E06 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35]) by smtp1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FA2586860 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D4728671A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:23:28 +0100 (CET) From: Bo =?utf-8?q?=C3=98rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:23:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <200801132151.55811.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <200801141048.08716.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> In-Reply-To: <200801141048.08716.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1586771.3U9VejN7hU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801141123.53070.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: bb2e25c0-7aa2-4552-a4e4-5f3a0c989360 X-Archives-Hash: c76d5e7b5de5a076e184ef9c8235c1c4 --nextPart1586771.3U9VejN7hU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 14 January 2008 10:48:08 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: > > > You can use Daniel Robbins' stage3s: > > > > Why should I? They're likely also built with different use flags than > > the ones I use. Thus I will end up recompiling anyway. > > Ah ok, I wrongly thought yours was more a problem of outdated stage3 > tarballs rather than different USE flags. In this case yes, the best > option is starting from stage1. Not really. emerge -e world from a stage 3 is still both considerably less= =20 effort than stage 1 and much more reliable. Furthermore stage 1 is complete= ly=20 unsupported and for a very good reason. =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart1586771.3U9VejN7hU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHizg48/kKEzmwNNoRAh3YAJ92tPu96G9FceIOPsjfGm/Ef28RUgCgktaW Yi1ty9Qd3lLWfDe+zGFcm9E= =NZxF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1586771.3U9VejN7hU-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list