From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JE9oZ-0004Bp-85 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:52:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04359E0CBA; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A07CE0CB8 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (p54BBAD26.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.187.173.38]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML21M-1JE9oC2dym-0006GN; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:51:56 +0100 From: Dirk Heinrichs Organization: Privat To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:51:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <200801131009.01085.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <200801132028.51074.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> In-Reply-To: <200801132028.51074.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2187910.2RbJtOuIoo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801132151.55811.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Qxut5rMsB18cPcOXgHIC9iTZrYURs81Hpfhv nyWwj4eMGYVTea3l8xs+ey2K57mv3AdFIwZEOsjMP2RwxLHC2A NwdqzVan77NZxEMAfsfbA== X-Archives-Salt: eb35c180-0972-45d0-bd04-52ef7f09014d X-Archives-Hash: 72fb51ef37b17fbb6ea73f9f19fb4785 --nextPart2187910.2RbJtOuIoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2008 schrieb Etaoin Shrdlu: > You can use Daniel Robbins' stage3s: Why should I? They're likely also built with different use flags than the o= nes=20 I use. Thus I will end up recompiling anyway. Updating the compiler=20 recompiled a couple dozen packages before. With a stage1 install I have the= =20 compiler, binutils and libc versions of my choice right from the beginning= =20 and don't need to think about which packages have been compiled with an old= =20 (or just different) compiler, possibly causing trouble later. Bye... Dirk --nextPart2187910.2RbJtOuIoo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHinnr8NVtnsLkZ7sRAn4dAJ492pTpRkzfSlqTehF5vfyLyoySvwCfb3/N dYfIoWbyUSJF7+W5KKAtPSw= =wwHh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2187910.2RbJtOuIoo-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list