From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDyqJ-0004yL-LC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:09:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF10E07C4; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C56E07C3 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (p54BBAD26.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.187.173.38]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwh2-1JDypy0tmG-00067f; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:09:02 +0100 From: Dirk Heinrichs Organization: Privat To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:08:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <200801131056.14159.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200801131056.14159.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1928878.m2c1fk5WSb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801131009.01085.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+t2R1+z00VdXS2O0/jX66BMIyeBUBKJxf3sup fzv6VA2TuvsLBOe2iLh7HssNCeXhCKlEUh+3XGhhrz/7F0/R63 TLkvmz3JhyEyMQYkR5vUQ== X-Archives-Salt: d19c1949-860e-43c5-9760-f8c78d61f9f2 X-Archives-Hash: cd2b0112fa08fdebc543a845cc085a6b --nextPart1928878.m2c1fk5WSb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2008 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Saturday 12 January 2008, James wrote: > > > As far as I'm concerned, the Gentoo install CD could easily be > > > dropped without a loss. > > > > Well, I differ with this statement 100%. What, IMHO, needs to > > happened is the whole install process be changed to a minimal working > > kernel and basic tools. Then you fork the install in the direction as > > to what the system is to be used for: embedded-gentoo, firewall, > > bridge, managed switch, server (mail, web, dns, terminal etc etc) and > > last the complicated nightmare of a workstation =A0(kde vs gnome vs etc > > etc). > > Excellent idea. When can we expect your first alpha-release? > > When we have rough consensus and your running code, we can include your > project in the list of workable install methods. And while where at it: Get those stage1 installs back into the Handbook. I = did=20 a stage3 install 2 weeks ago and it was a nightmare. One needs to recompile= =20 nearly everything afterwards, so stage3 doesn't make any difference. Bye... Dirk --nextPart1928878.m2c1fk5WSb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHidUt8NVtnsLkZ7sRAoHLAJ9LW8nfVTklfbkT2Bfe3zooEfC3YwCfR9Nh AzX2rE0YCMPCw2xIakDByXw= =J4jM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1928878.m2c1fk5WSb-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list