From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ?
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:16:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801122216.39657.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1200157659.6873.25.camel@localhost>
On Samstag, 12. Januar 2008, Richard Marzan wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 07:34 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 12 January 2008, Jil Larner wrote:
> > >> Well, it's like if I am opening my eyes. I never looked at what the
> > >> foundation was supposed to do. For a couple of years I've been using
> > >> gentoo, I never get any political announcement, maybe because I didn't
> > >> look at the right place, or maybe there was no. I mean that except the
> > >> Gentoo's Philosophy and the Gentoo's Social Contract, I didn't see
> > >> politic, for my eyes were probably closed.
> > >> It doesn't mean I didn't enjoyed gentoo, its power, its flexibility,
> > >> its community. But I certainly missed something. There are so many
> > >> ways to communicate (lists, IRC, boards, wikis, project pages, etc.)
> > >> that I must admit I'm sometime lost.
> > >>
> > >> Today, I learn we're in trouble. Good. What trouble ? What's happening
> > >> ? Why through the words of Daniel Robbins, I feel some fear ? I feel
> > >> he foresees a dead end and offers an opportunity to change before it
> > >> is too late. Once more, to quote Matrix, "the problem is choice". In
> > >> Free Software, there are often choices where the community can get
> > >> involved in and it makes our strength. The problem is, and is not,
> > >> legal papers. Because, IMO, legal papers are the visible part of an
> > >> Iceberg. Could someone tell me what *really* is the crisis ? If people
> > >> did not do what they were supposed to do : what should they have done
> > >> ?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >
> > > I am equally agnostic of Gentoo management politics, albeit grateful
> > > that people volunteer their time and effort to keep it going. From the
> > > little exposure that I have had to it all it seems to me that Alan's
> > > views ring depressingly true. I read Daniel's blog and cannot disagree
> > > with what he suggests - it makes common sense that users views and
> > > desires should determine Gentoo's direction, but I have not read
> > > between the lines to see how might his proposals lead to directions
> > > that I would not readily agree with. See this excerpt of his below
> > > from OSNews.com in 2002:
> > >
> > > "I very much want to find a way to turn the Gentoo Linux project into a
> > > profitable enterprise. My main motivation in wanting to do this is so I
> > > can stop living from paycheck to paycheck and focus my professional
> > > efforts exclusively on Gentoo Linux development. Many of our developers
> > > would like to do the same thing"
> > >
> > > (I am not critising this statement of his; after all I would very much
> > > like to find myself a sustainable way of being able to do what I like -
> > > without having to spend the biggest part of my day in my current job.)
> > >
> > > Giving a free hand to any single person is not safe in my humble view,
> > > especially if that person is employed by Microsoft - I will find hard
> > > to rest assured that there will be no conflict of interest. On the
> > > other hand it seems that Gentoo desperately needs *mature* leadership,
> > > which can fulfill some rather significant responsibilities. From what
> > > I read the current Gentoo administration and management setup does not
> > > seem to be able to behave with the professionalism required to achieve
> > > that. This makes me anxious for the future of Gentoo.
> > >
> > > Just my 2c's.
> >
> > I have been using Gentoo for about 4 or 5 years now. I to think Gentoo
> > has well, lost its way. It seems like a bunch of teenagers is running
> > it sometimes. They decide something then go back a few steps when they
> > don't like the results. Proctors come to mind on that. Users seems to
> > be the last thing on the higher ups mind. That is not good.
> >
> > I love my Gentoo but I would like to see someone step up and get some
> > things done and some decisions made, even those we may never know about.
> >
> > I just don't want to see Gentoo fall into the abyss.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > :-) :-)
>
> Although he works for Microsoft,
worked
not works.
> Daniel is the one who created this project
and then he walked away.
And don't forget his stunt last year, when he came back for 2 days and started
a big fat flame war.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-12 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-12 9:11 [gentoo-user] Daniel Robbins' come back ? alain.didierjean
2008-01-12 10:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 12:08 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-12 12:55 ` Mick
2008-01-12 13:34 ` Dale
2008-01-12 17:07 ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 17:22 ` Renat Golubchyk
2008-01-12 17:49 ` Hal Martin
2008-01-12 18:13 ` Richard Marzan
2008-01-12 21:17 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 14:07 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 14:23 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 14:33 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 15:06 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-13 16:31 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 17:37 ` Naga Toro
2008-01-14 5:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 11:43 ` Galevsky
2008-01-14 11:19 ` Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-13 16:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-13 22:39 ` Dale
2008-01-14 6:54 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-14 7:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 7:41 ` Dale
2008-01-14 7:51 ` Naga
2008-01-14 8:10 ` Dale
2008-01-14 16:18 ` James
2008-01-14 11:16 ` [gentoo-user] " Eddie Mihalow Jr
2008-01-19 15:37 ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-19 19:55 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-16 4:58 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? »Q«
2008-01-13 14:48 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 20:03 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-12 21:16 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2008-01-13 9:10 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 17:11 ` Δημήτριος Ροπόκης
2008-01-19 12:45 ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-20 0:40 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2008-01-23 17:35 ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-23 18:48 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2008-01-12 22:06 ` James
2008-01-13 0:03 ` Dale
2008-01-13 4:08 ` James
2008-01-13 7:56 ` Mark Kirkwood
2008-01-13 9:31 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 2:52 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-13 9:58 ` Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13 9:29 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-12 19:19 ` [gentoo-user] " fire-eyes
2008-01-13 9:37 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13 10:05 ` Alan E. Davis
2008-01-14 8:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Thufir
2008-01-13 10:06 ` [gentoo-user] " Uwe Thiem
2008-01-13 10:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-13 1:12 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2008-01-13 10:41 ` Mick
2008-01-13 14:51 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 1:19 ` James
2008-01-14 5:35 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-14 6:04 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-14 12:31 ` Mick
2008-01-14 10:26 ` Thufir
2008-01-14 16:51 ` James
2008-01-14 18:11 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 18:30 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 19:47 ` James
2008-01-14 20:40 ` reader
2008-01-14 21:13 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-14 21:03 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 5:22 ` reader
2008-01-15 5:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 7:26 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-15 7:57 ` Mick
2008-01-14 21:51 ` Jil Larner
2008-01-15 0:31 ` Iain Buchanan
2008-01-14 19:15 ` James
2008-01-14 20:43 ` [gentoo-user] Re: License issues [was:Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-14 21:33 ` James
2008-01-14 22:16 ` Etaoin Shrdlu
2008-01-15 11:39 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-14 21:16 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Alan McKinnon
2008-01-15 1:36 ` James
2008-01-15 11:34 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-15 11:31 ` Michael Schmarck
2008-01-17 6:37 ` Thufir
2008-01-19 14:55 ` [gentoo-user] Quo vadis Gentoo [WAS: Daniel Robbins' come back ?] Enrico Weigelt
2008-01-14 10:30 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Thufir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801122216.39657.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox