From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDhX6-0000WR-Ku for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:40:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5AB4E0584; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E78E048F for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so651299ugf.49 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:39:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=TmiBK1prmYLLqy/Kh/Ua4oe0LvXC5lZbNp7SbXeH+mk=; b=faraByCHv/ce4vY4UF/F0zkmizl9umeP59WElXERui0dDhcp1N7ip0D2A8x1bmBng28WXSB3LRsjkpoMJAG2zlsTajPXF+YeTTY38kEB4Pz6IZPFxO7h9N/CYPOb+1ipTd+uhbP5tzJyUaET7Wi1aqncbbJM9+ESGBUWiGLbdBg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=hgRs0AVVPRw5d+PMZT9roX734oq9skVFsXWjhwa2nF2VU5j+KSdwZF1G4X8vx2D+Mh9DKjXaUe3cmA2SZHD/zPyqjeUc0F7bEAqPyumzyF6t9R7iJvLVqQnsvuzkRKPLqfJdKrh1/+3FlqVJyh4dvFtX8tAPYu0l+CyGGbeYgwY= Received: by 10.66.224.19 with SMTP id w19mr953594ugg.34.1200148794463; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from lappy.study ( [213.162.120.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4sm4993463ugc.73.2008.01.12.06.39.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:39:53 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:38:50 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <200801121159.11312.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4788C00D.3000905@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4788C00D.3000905@bellsouth.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5272943.iCUeWINMVJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801121438.52384.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 7b7931fd-e273-4a4d-88aa-30427ab612c9 X-Archives-Hash: aadd1614a8856d20fc29b5c2753cdb08 --nextPart5272943.iCUeWINMVJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > . . . but you responded to a plain text message from the list, which as= I > > recall you could always do. The problem I believe is when you start a > > new message. Email me off list with a new message and I will confirm if > > it is also plain text. > > But then it won't be to gentoo.org. LOL It may not work then. ;-) Doh! Still asleep . . . :)) > I'll post something somewhere else. Maybe someone will point out if it > is not plain text, I guess they will anyway. I'll keep an eye out then for any new threads of yours and flame you if it = is=20 html, ha, ha! :)) =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart5272943.iCUeWINMVJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHiND85Fp0QerLYPcRApyhAKDE6zOIXu2eflztt+kroBdx4REAYACfaATt bTrHAyMkiIr/DdAWm5ziZ18= =KS1B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5272943.iCUeWINMVJ-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list