From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDf2g-0003ju-Jz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:00:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24B1DE07A9; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEF7E0792 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so638155ugf.49 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:00:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=t3EoeS+b0VKv1ADgB1m2yamra1LlKQys2sBpeCEFEdE=; b=x10HI5FFNL2dkg2kD2IB4vRdLYJ7MdwjNzwJi6gi4oe8A/EdfocpMgoxyIAF4zgVns+bvlgo7K+bH5N5764Eq9M+8Twi8Aa0hrFdfXSZTd491iX/V7og+lxbrZnwBSpk82MYiO+Agimi5xOAxNHrzVu95MgCohW4PZDR0jDS9wg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=AbJsZg1mvyoBDE5gMajnGcIsoRX1mfNAdzOV/YFwhV16uxw2MI6F3ISmR97m/7pQBOZ1SO7X7u4PLxRNYGdWNNT6SisdAkzwXTJCpwCwrNKR9qLtRyqp8eBG3ASoa91vD3p9Oegz8p+pR+qj2uw6Pjf5rMsuMugoItK7604W4PU= Received: by 10.66.219.11 with SMTP id r11mr1123357ugg.31.1200139212737; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:00:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lappy.study ( [213.162.120.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k28sm14024733ugd.77.2008.01.12.04.00.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:00:11 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] HTML vs. Text messages (WAS: Is GWN dead?) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:59:08 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <200801121020.10277.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4788A584.8020300@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4788A584.8020300@bellsouth.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1628753.0APIRq6E5t"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801121159.11312.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 0ac46a45-f950-4f7d-be95-08c21c94380d X-Archives-Hash: fec799e9c34852c9e49b5d2cafe21252 --nextPart1628753.0APIRq6E5t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 12 January 2008, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > Hmm, he may be waiting for you to do it, while you're explaining to all > > these moms out there why you may think that top-posting in this ML would > > be considered good netiquette? BTW, I'm not condoning thread hi-jacking > > either . . . > > > > To Dale: have you tried setting up new addresses in the Seamonkey's > > Address Book with and > > and for each of these select to only send plain > > text messages? > > > > From previous threads I remember that you can send plain text when you > > respond to a plain text message in this ML, but not otherwise. This > > could be that you do not have both addresses above set up to only send > > plain text format. > > > > WARNING: I have not yet used Seamonkey, but vaguely remember something > > like this in the old Mozilla/Netscape features. > > > > HTH. > > Thanks. I didn't know you could change that in the address book. Can > you tell me how this one comes through? It should be plain text, > hopefully only plain text. > > Neat trick. ;-) OK, this is plain text as I can see in the message headers: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =2E . . but you responded to a plain text message from the list, which as I= =20 recall you could always do. The problem I believe is when you start a new= =20 message. Email me off list with a new message and I will confirm if it is= =20 also plain text. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1628753.0APIRq6E5t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHiKuP5Fp0QerLYPcRAs7yAJ97gBgq5aWA52pvnQxA4egeX45dFACfaMPU Ju1Y12MXODLf0TpO4/cmxJk= =r4Wc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1628753.0APIRq6E5t-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list