From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDKWU-00067f-Ql for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:06:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E617E0A61; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16336E0A60 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so629588nze.1 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:51:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=cf54/uJTnShjWvKsYZJPRyenV4RS+ij309XXEw3SqVM=; b=w7AV0qXLRxBx6hFTUmFMF6X3c1kh94ZMXKPYOiNZDezdL+OcYcJSRq2Gkueb1945oOdwq94dClWZPhJ1rn19nI3uXeVrNh/Wast2bfQXE5VR2Qvp9N0zAycNiQ3myTP52XtOlN/TcnFNOT7aIcmgvq1WVecXhtEMndYuH5+XjHY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=OiXJMKdlHw/FIxLZZIol+f8CFFVwHa5exkAmZMYPupYfwmaTZpE96SLg6fkrk7YSp36dzyJzk2kC+N5EJPy7SESDz/1lClMoaFY/roy0+RulKTtBCLIrv1lSYEQFLHgK/oHLDI6KPNHIvNCtVoAb/AyTLgjkUVFJ1NLWTee5jis= Received: by 10.142.165.9 with SMTP id n9mr1622055wfe.58.1200059474390; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:51:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.9? ( [196.209.34.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i8sm4350038rng.19.2008.01.11.05.51.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:51:13 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead? Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:46:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080111082729.GA12107@localhost> <4787709A.5020003@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4787709A.5020003@bellsouth.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801111546.03887.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 2942b778-0ab4-489e-8342-fe6b4cc3f78a X-Archives-Hash: fb86202ca203da28c0baa30270255f81 On Friday 11 January 2008, Dale wrote: > Qian Qiao wrote: > > I'm sorry this goes OT Dale, but unfortunately, my mail client > > cannot render html messages properly, and I trust a lot of people > > on the list have the same problem. If would be nice if you can post > > in plain text, at least in this list. > > > > Thanks > > I have it set to send it text for this domain. Is it not sending in > plain text? I have the same settings for other mailing lists as > well. > > Thanks for pointing it out if it is not sending plain text tho. It's sent multipart, so the pure text can be used alone for users like Qian Qiao. That's how I've set up my kmail (I can view it as html if I wish) To be honest, it's not really a big deal for a list like this. The text is 492 bytes, the html is 867 bytes and the whole thing is 4.5k In other words, the text and html *together* are still smaller than the headers :-) -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list