From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCB1D-0002fQ-2f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:45:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0CF0E0CFB; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146D4E0CFA for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b22so5972523rvf.46 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:44:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=KtekNp3o8qoi+zZHap/QfkBychqqKVGKAsYMit3E1J0=; b=OkHXIGOIZfmrgCQSU0TTqGopF9maCZkKwSiD2IUcPys1MmHYPuOPRBXSj/8RQnWPavYsoAsidQrmlpeklSxv7XxY0czSkixzGR2En7J94e4DbT0dYhvfvXHLqq7EdyJgWnXK0cW8XE5XfEFlSj4NH6Nvi8tFLin2EO9ikYhbjEk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=xB2duwGsqz+gcfb5e2+1NRie/Xz7sJDI6vIs+4N3GlAYg5Sf6CUquXYxpSHBKDhOjFQ0AmIghftH52xyOHJ95s8C2Qhds4gHsPODHgy6fixZJbQCy/bsCeeanLaNtiW/+VSmF3fcrzPH9T0x4eanW3Reh3PMZudpFOgTEmLt7H0= Received: by 10.141.48.10 with SMTP id a10mr11263427rvk.35.1199785475550; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.9? ( [196.209.34.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h2sm6099477rnb.17.2008.01.08.01.44.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:44:34 -0800 (PST) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge of ksh93 erroring out.. who can interpret Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:39:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801081139.54044.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 9531fdea-694f-4280-a27e-d93ff820bb6b X-Archives-Hash: d271401461c32ecbafe6d8aec4394723 On Monday 07 January 2008, Harry Putnam wrote: > I'm having a time getting ksh93 to install (build error at the end) > > USE='static' emerge -v ksh93 > > The only other use flag coming up was `nls' > > I wasn't real eager for `static' necessarily but without `static' had > already failed and I saw it was a possible flag. Also it might be > handy sometime in a trouble situation where only `/ ' is mounted. > > But that discussion is for some other time. > > Can anyone interpret this emerge failure and have some educated > guesses what I should do to get it to compile. That message follows > the eix output below. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4210019.html?sid=a282fd302189d999924b214267ec5b90 especially last 4 posts Apparently it's a bug, and has been fixed in later versions. You are using a stable 2004 version, in your position I would unmask ksh and emerge the latest unstable -- Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list