From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Il22s-0000MO-5E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:42:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9PCdrUo008132; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:39:53 GMT Received: from dcnode-01.unlimitedmail.net ([212.85.44.112]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9PCW0BY029940 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:32:00 GMT Received: from ppp.zz ([137.204.208.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by dcnode-01.unlimitedmail.net (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9PCVBOD025173 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:31:13 +0200 From: Etaoin Shrdlu To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] pam limits Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:31:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47207f82.08b6660a.545e.ffffcb22@mx.google.com> <1193312749.27662.34.camel@blackwidow.nbk> <200710251425.03520.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> In-Reply-To: <200710251425.03520.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710251431.04605.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> X-UnlimitedMail-MailScanner-From: shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Archives-Salt: f61d64bb-4b00-45de-94dd-34f808dd1280 X-Archives-Hash: e03a8f4dadf1f69e8a6991cf469df211 On Thursday 25 October 2007, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: > After a little search, it seems that the USERGROUPS_ENAB directive > in /etc/login.defs, although not explicitly mentioning this issue, is > the culprit. Setting it to "no" restores the old behavior (putting the > new users into group "users"). Found bug #128715 about the issue, apparently "fixed" but not stating clearly what the correct behavior should be. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list