Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nagios or Konqueror

[Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]

On Friday 19 October 2007, James wrote:
> Justin T. <purplegecko <at> gmx.net> writes:
> > > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died
> > > unexpectedly. =======================================================
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not
> > > have such problems.
> >
> > There seems to be an issue with Konqueror and some of the new Openssl
> > versions.
>
> You may want to install JFFNMS (in portage)[1] and see if you get
> weird browser behavior with that Network Management System. You may also
> discover many advanced features that make jffnms much more appealing
> than Nagios..... hence the phrase that is popular with many jffnms users:
>
> 'Adios Nagios'

Thanks James, but the server owner wants Nagios (for now).  Is there a link to 
a (factual) comparative summary between the two monitoring systems?  Does 
JFFNMS have as many plugins as Nagios?  I'd be grateful for your (subjective) 
views too. :)
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]