[gentoo-user] Nagios or Konqueror

[gentoo-user] Nagios or Konqueror

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 862 bytes --]

Hi All,

I am not sure if this is a generic browser issue, a server issue, or something 
wrong with my Konqueror-3.5.7-r3 installation.  When I login into a Nagios 
and go to e.g. services page with Konqueror I get this message in the main 
body:
=======================================================
An error occurred while loading 
https://nagios.blah-blah.com/cgi-bin/status.cgi?host=all:
The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died unexpectedly.
=======================================================

If I click again on the menu to load services the page invariably loads, but 
only partly.  Icons don't show and red/green colour status does not load 
either.

This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not have 
such problems.

Any ideas what could be causing this?
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Nagios or Konqueror

[Volker Armin Hemmann]

On Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am not sure if this is a generic browser issue, a server issue, or
> something wrong with my Konqueror-3.5.7-r3 installation.  When I login into
> a Nagios and go to e.g. services page with Konqueror I get this message in
> the main body:
> =======================================================
> An error occurred while loading
> https://nagios.blah-blah.com/cgi-bin/status.cgi?host=all:
> The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died
> unexpectedly. =======================================================
>
> If I click again on the menu to load services the page invariably loads,
> but only partly.  Icons don't show and red/green colour status does not
> load either.
>
> This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not
> have such problems.
>
> Any ideas what could be causing this?

timeouts too short?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Nagios or Konqueror

[Justin T.]

On Friday 19 October 2007 00:12:53 Mick wrote:

<snip>
> The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died
> unexpectedly. =======================================================
<snip>
> This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not
> have such problems.
>
> Any ideas what could be causing this?

Hey :)

There seems to be an issue with Konqueror and some of the new Openssl 
versions.  You may want to check which version you have and update to the 
latest (openssl-0.9.8f works for me) and then recompile kdelibs if it still 
doesn't work (not sure if this is required as I did it anyways.)

# emerge -av openssl kdelibs

Something along those lines should hopefully take care of your problem.

Hope that helps,

Justin T
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Nagios or Konqueror

[James]

Justin T. <purplegecko <at> gmx.net> writes:


> > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died
> > unexpectedly. =======================================================
> <snip>
> > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not
> > have such problems.


> There seems to be an issue with Konqueror and some of the new Openssl 
> versions.  



You may want to install JFFNMS (in portage)[1] and see if you get
weird browser behavior with that Network Management System. You may also
discover many advanced features that make jffnms much more appealing
than Nagios..... hence the phrase that is popular with many jffnms users:

'Adios Nagios'


hth,
James




http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/jffnms.xml
[1] 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nagios or Konqueror

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]

On Friday 19 October 2007, James wrote:
> Justin T. <purplegecko <at> gmx.net> writes:
> > > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died
> > > unexpectedly. =======================================================
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not
> > > have such problems.
> >
> > There seems to be an issue with Konqueror and some of the new Openssl
> > versions.
>
> You may want to install JFFNMS (in portage)[1] and see if you get
> weird browser behavior with that Network Management System. You may also
> discover many advanced features that make jffnms much more appealing
> than Nagios..... hence the phrase that is popular with many jffnms users:
>
> 'Adios Nagios'

Thanks James, but the server owner wants Nagios (for now).  Is there a link to 
a (factual) comparative summary between the two monitoring systems?  Does 
JFFNMS have as many plugins as Nagios?  I'd be grateful for your (subjective) 
views too. :)
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Nagios or Konqueror

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 915 bytes --]

On Friday 19 October 2007, Justin T. wrote:
> On Friday 19 October 2007 00:12:53 Mick wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died
> > unexpectedly. =======================================================
>
> <snip>
>
> > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not
> > have such problems.
> >
> > Any ideas what could be causing this?
>
> Hey :)
>
> There seems to be an issue with Konqueror and some of the new Openssl
> versions.  You may want to check which version you have and update to the
> latest (openssl-0.9.8f works for me) and then recompile kdelibs if it still
> doesn't work (not sure if this is required as I did it anyways.)
>
> # emerge -av openssl kdelibs
>
> Something along those lines should hopefully take care of your problem.

Hmm, remerged both but problem remains . . .
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Nagios or Konqueror

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]

On Thursday 18 October 2007, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007, Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am not sure if this is a generic browser issue, a server issue, or
> > something wrong with my Konqueror-3.5.7-r3 installation.  When I login
> > into a Nagios and go to e.g. services page with Konqueror I get this
> > message in the main body:
> > =======================================================
> > An error occurred while loading
> > https://nagios.blah-blah.com/cgi-bin/status.cgi?host=all:
> > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died
> > unexpectedly. =======================================================
> >
> > If I click again on the menu to load services the page invariably loads,
> > but only partly.  Icons don't show and red/green colour status does not
> > load either.
> >
> > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour.  Other browsers do not
> > have such problems.
> >
> > Any ideas what could be causing this?
>
> timeouts too short?

On Konqueror?  How do I configure this?

Thanks.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Nagios or Konqueror

[James]

Mick <michaelkintzios <at> gmail.com> writes:


> Thanks James, but the server owner wants Nagios (for now).  Is there a link to 
> a (factual) comparative summary between the two monitoring systems?  Does 
> JFFNMS have as many plugins as Nagios?  I'd be grateful for your (subjective) 
> views too. :)


How about:
http://www.nagios.org/about/
vs
http://www.jffnms.com/features.php



I just know we have lots of folks that use to be Nagios users...

ymmv,


James

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list