From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can RAM render useless the encryption of the / and swap partitions?
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 20:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710042048.30493.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710041949.27911.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1387 bytes --]
On Thursday 04 October 2007, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2007, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On 10/4/07, Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
>
> wrote:
> > > in practice, the ram has to refreshed every few cycles (on reason why
> > > it is slow) because it is loosing its load so fast.
> > >
> > > In practice, after power is cut, everything in ram is lost.
> > >
> > > But not the stuff in swap....
> >
> > Considering that swap is encrypted, is it realistic for this "lost"
> > RAM data to be recovered? Again, take the case of a well funded
> > organization.
>
> that depends on the encryption. Some algorithms are easy to break. Some are
> not, some will be broken as soon as we get quantum-computers ;)
Are we missing the obvious? The easiest think to 'break' is the weakest link
in the chain. In such a *hypothetical* case that would be the person who is
in possession of the passphrase. I would expect that such a person would be
invariably labeled a "hacker" and condemned to eternity . . .
Cracking the encryption algorithm by computation would only be necessary if
the said person was not able to disclose the key due to absence, or due to an
inability to recover from the vegetative (or worse) state that the
questioning methods may have inadvertently induced.
:P
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-04 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-04 6:42 [gentoo-user] Can RAM render useless the encryption of the / and swap partitions? Liviu Andronic
2007-10-04 13:47 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-10-04 14:34 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-10-04 15:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2007-10-04 16:04 ` Liviu Andronic
2007-10-04 17:49 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2007-10-04 18:28 ` Liviu Andronic
2007-10-04 19:48 ` Mick [this message]
2007-10-05 20:57 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-10-06 4:22 ` Liviu Andronic
2007-10-06 9:04 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2007-10-04 16:57 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-10-04 18:33 ` Liviu Andronic
2007-10-05 11:38 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-10-05 18:57 ` Randy Barlow
2007-10-05 20:44 ` Liviu Andronic
2007-10-09 1:51 ` Alex Schuster
2007-10-15 21:45 ` Liviu Andronic
2007-10-04 18:53 ` Randy Barlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710042048.30493.michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--to=michaelkintzios@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox