* [gentoo-user] keeping ati-drivers 8.34.8 in portage
@ 2007-09-11 11:00 Iain Buchanan
2007-09-11 12:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-09-11 14:53 ` [gentoo-user] " James
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Iain Buchanan @ 2007-09-11 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
Due to the recent X updates, portage wants to upgrade ati-drivers. I am
having problems with all ati-drivers newer than 8.34.8 [1], so what is
the official way to make sure 8.34.8 stays there until a newer version
is released that fixes these problems? Is just filing a bug against a
specific version enough?
(I already know how to mask the newer xorg versions, no probs)
The bug I did file [2] was marked resolved, upstream, but I only
mentioned the latest release of ati-drivers, not all of them. I've also
found out a bit more since then. So what's the official way to keep an
ebuild around? I noticed there are quite a few versions
in /usr/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers, but maybe not for long?!
thanks,
[1] see previous post "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fglrx and posix shared mem"
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185825
--
Iain Buchanan <iain at pcorp dot com dot au>
Homer: I keep hearing this horrible irregular thumping noise.
Pump Jockey:
It's your heart. And I think it's on its last thump.
Homer: Whew, I was afraid it was my transmission.
Homer's Triple Bypass
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] keeping ati-drivers 8.34.8 in portage
2007-09-11 11:00 [gentoo-user] keeping ati-drivers 8.34.8 in portage Iain Buchanan
@ 2007-09-11 12:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-09-11 14:53 ` [gentoo-user] " James
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2007-09-11 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the recent X updates, portage wants to upgrade ati-drivers. I
> am having problems with all ati-drivers newer than 8.34.8 [1], so
> what is the official way to make sure 8.34.8 stays there until a
> newer version is released that fixes these problems? Is just filing
> a bug against a specific version enough?
I think filing a bug isn;t enough as a dev can easily remove the ebuild
you need from the tree anyway. You should copy the 8.34.8 ebuild to a
personal overlay, and mask >8.34.8 as an interim measure
alan
--
Optimists say the glass is half full,
Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?
Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: keeping ati-drivers 8.34.8 in portage
2007-09-11 11:00 [gentoo-user] keeping ati-drivers 8.34.8 in portage Iain Buchanan
2007-09-11 12:18 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2007-09-11 14:53 ` James
2007-09-12 0:06 ` Iain Buchanan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James @ 2007-09-11 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Iain Buchanan <iain <at> pcorp.com.au> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Due to the recent X updates, portage wants to upgrade ati-drivers. I am
> having problems with all ati-drivers newer than 8.34.8
Hello Iain,
Like you, I have had some issues with ati-drivers, particularly with newer
[580} chipsets. I went to an ATI site and poke around reading for a while.
I've been using 8.39.4 for quite some time on 2 newer systems and it
is stable(or at least with the 3D game bzflag) and normal workstation usage.
My experience is trial and error, burning lots of time before you find
an ati-driver that works good with your chipset. I'm not sure the criteria
or who marks ati-drivers as stable, but, ati-drivers-8.39.4 would get
an affirmative from me.
hth,
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: keeping ati-drivers 8.34.8 in portage
2007-09-11 14:53 ` [gentoo-user] " James
@ 2007-09-12 0:06 ` Iain Buchanan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Iain Buchanan @ 2007-09-12 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 14:53 +0000, James wrote:
[snip]
> I've been using 8.39.4 for quite some time on 2 newer systems and it
> is stable(or at least with the 3D game bzflag) and normal workstation usage.
>
> My experience is trial and error, burning lots of time before you find
> an ati-driver that works good with your chipset. I'm not sure the criteria
> or who marks ati-drivers as stable, but, ati-drivers-8.39.4 would get
> an affirmative from me.
thanks. I did try them, in fact I tried each of these versions multiple
times one day when trying to find the problem:
8.36.5
8.37.6
8.39.4
8.40.4
and each of them had the
fglX11AllocateManagedSurface: __FGLTexMgrAllocMem failed!! error that I
talked about before :(
I even posted on the ati forums and no one could help...
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>
Baseball is a skilled game. It's America's game - it, and high taxes.
-- The Best of Will Rogers
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-12 0:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-11 11:00 [gentoo-user] keeping ati-drivers 8.34.8 in portage Iain Buchanan
2007-09-11 12:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-09-11 14:53 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2007-09-12 0:06 ` Iain Buchanan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox