From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IV4oX-000774-1n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:25:57 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l8BCHctX024447; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:17:38 GMT Received: from csmtpout2.frontal.correo (mailhost.terra.es [213.4.149.241] (may be forged)) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8BCCGkp018064 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:12:17 GMT Received: from localhost (86.111.89.113) by csmtpout2.frontal.correo (7.3.118.4) (authenticated as i92guboj.terra.es) id 46E538980003764A for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:12:17 +0200 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:12:11 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SmVzw7pz?= Guerrero To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How do you handle new Xorg + nvidia + ~x86? Message-Id: <20070911141211.86262815.i92guboj@terra.es> In-Reply-To: <46E61F30.30209@comcast.net> References: <921Xn-1wS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <922Tr-2W4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <925on-6Q1-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <46E61F30.30209@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.5 (GTK+ 2.10.14; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l8BCHctq024447 X-Archives-Salt: aeab0b66-0796-4d55-bf44-365708d0cea2 X-Archives-Hash: 1297084c2fde5e6bb8ccd073baf8b998 On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:53:04 -0400 Mike wrote: > =EF=BF=BD Guerrero wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 03:36:13 +0200 > > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > So the nvidia people say. Though I can confirm that in my installatio= n > > it doesn't work. It just lockups (and yes, I am sure that X composite > > was off, because I always have it off). > >=20 > The lockup is probably caused by having the hal use flag set when you=20 > compile xorg-server. If you disable it you should be able to run the X=20 > server without conflicting with hal/dbus which was the problem. Can you give me some more info/links or pointers about the reasoning behind this? Why should hal be a problem when it always worked without a single problem? Or maybe a misunderstood you and you mean that is the conjunction of=20 a broken driver (nvidia) and the hal stuff, bit in that case the guilty is not hal anyway, but the driver. Also, I wonder why would I want to run X without hal/dbus support :P Thanks. --=20 Jes=C3=BAs Guerrero --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list