* [gentoo-user] Lets push our disttro "Gentoo" UP - Cast your vote!
@ 2007-09-01 5:02 Joseph
2007-09-01 7:43 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Mick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph @ 2007-09-01 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Cast your vote!
Of the most popular DESKTOP Linux distro's (2007 Top List) , which is
the most secure?
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/component/option,com_poll/task,results/id,34/
--
#Joseph
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Lets push our disttro "Gentoo" UP - Cast your vote!
2007-09-01 5:02 [gentoo-user] Lets push our disttro "Gentoo" UP - Cast your vote! Joseph
@ 2007-09-01 7:43 ` Mick
2007-09-01 7:52 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2007-09-01 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 715 bytes --]
On Saturday 01 September 2007, Joseph wrote:
> Cast your vote!
>
> Of the most popular DESKTOP Linux distro's (2007 Top List) , which is
> the most secure?
> http://www.linuxsecurity.com/component/option,com_poll/task,results/id,34/
Hmm, I'm not sure. The question is which *is* the most secure distro, not
which can be made the most secure. A vanilla Gentoo installation (I know
there is no such thing with Gentoo) has no firewall installed. Any
application can open any port to the wind and especially with a poor security
policy has the potential to expose the box to an attack. More so than a
binary distro Gentoo relies on an intelligent configuration to be secure.
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Lets push our disttro "Gentoo" UP - Cast your vote!
2007-09-01 7:43 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Mick
@ 2007-09-01 7:52 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-09-01 8:10 ` Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2007-09-01 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 803 bytes --]
Hello Mick,
> Hmm, I'm not sure. The question is which *is* the most secure distro,
> not which can be made the most secure. A vanilla Gentoo installation
> (I know there is no such thing with Gentoo) has no firewall installed.
> Any application can open any port to the wind and especially with a
> poor security policy has the potential to expose the box to an attack.
> More so than a binary distro Gentoo relies on an intelligent
> configuration to be secure.
On the other hand, a "vanilla" Gentoo installation could be considered a
bare Stage 3, which has so little software installed it has to be the
most secure. Which only goes to show how meaningless such polls are.
--
Neil Bothwick
"Bother" said Rue, as his paranoia spread across the publicly accessible
archives
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Lets push our disttro "Gentoo" UP - Cast your vote!
2007-09-01 7:52 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2007-09-01 8:10 ` Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas
2007-09-03 19:23 ` Dan Farrell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas @ 2007-09-01 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 792 bytes --]
On Saturday 01 September 2007 00:52:58 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hello Mick,
>
> On the other hand, a "vanilla" Gentoo installation could be considered a
> bare Stage 3, which has so little software installed it has to be the
> most secure. Which only goes to show how meaningless such polls are.
Well the question does include "DESKTOP Linux distro" that should go as far
as X11 with a Window Manager, but heck any good sysadmin can make any distro
secure. So your right, these polls just cause in fighing.
--
Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas
# Free & Open Source Software Advocate
# KDE Developer: gamaral
$ irc: gamaral@freenode
@ blog: http://blog.guillermoamaral.com/
@ site: http://www.guillermoamaral.com/
% gpg: http://downloads.guillermoamaral.com/public.asc
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Lets push our disttro "Gentoo" UP - Cast your vote!
2007-09-01 8:10 ` Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas
@ 2007-09-03 19:23 ` Dan Farrell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dan Farrell @ 2007-09-03 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 01:10:30 -0700
Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas <me@guillermoamaral.com> wrote:
> > On the other hand, a "vanilla" Gentoo installation could be
> > considered a bare Stage 3, which has so little software installed
> > it has to be the most secure.
Also worth pointing out is since such a 'vanilla' stage3 would have
quite recent software, making it more likely that recently discovered
security holes have already been patched.
For this reason I think gentoo is a good cantidate for 'most secure
distro', the point already having been made that such a distinction is
basically meaningless.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-03 19:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-01 5:02 [gentoo-user] Lets push our disttro "Gentoo" UP - Cast your vote! Joseph
2007-09-01 7:43 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Mick
2007-09-01 7:52 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-09-01 8:10 ` Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas
2007-09-03 19:23 ` Dan Farrell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox