From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAc0S-000076-NT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:37:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6H1Z68K011706; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:35:06 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6H1Qmei031998 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:26:48 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3123E2074B5 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:26:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FBB206952 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:26:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTPSA id 24896190 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:26:48 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <14178ED3A898524FB036966D696494FB139C8F@messenger.cv63.navy.mil> <642958cc0707160515s3355abf2i2dd296be2ed6ac9@mail.gmail.com> <200707161753.12633.mcbrides9@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <200707161753.12633.mcbrides9@comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:26:46 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707170326.46166.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: c091b142-5498-4c71-9ec0-e38ae4a3c0a2 X-Archives-Hash: 20f93fed545ff34e3cb71d1bc53754b3 On Montag, 16. Juli 2007, Jerry McBride wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2007 08:15:43 am Mark Shields wrote: > > > Personally... reading what I have about the gpl 3.0 , I'd be pretty > comfortable having Gentoo/Portage moved to it. > > It offers a lot of protection that gpl 2. does not. > > Anyway, if it makes Microsoft "catch up" then it must be good. it takes away freedom - I am not sold to that 'must be good' aspect. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list