From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAVXX-0003Ou-K1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:43:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6GIf57i001127; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:41:05 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6GIUW6G017263 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:30:33 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so94688nfh for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=BQXAOcaYnW3SDGkAB0Yap8n/SeTbJdUVIm0jr3lWRTjo04WzshdTNCeHI0tVioIdZyYKKAmnz/s764iMlYe1oxLmFdS1vU+wVpFp+irUvI61H3n3o1mAvVi6eAP9CVsgCdYwMkKS6RML94uSSvANPZIE/UpbbDArM4TRfHbkSck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=pNXcX4bv87RDmQ8pf1JuDISLg2sjJIb7ORIcyahTD3PUeLE4y+0y0HAe+YKVr9PQ2TtcfCXnKrRzSs4dqr/jen/H7GZ15Z2Rrhlu2zTLdSHJTDG8+miyJ2DbYeekyJVOJxqyZ29aQolwHsH3TA7/qBCw1boZwTeX/dOIz6FjtPM= Received: by 10.82.126.5 with SMTP id y5mr5062368buc.1184610632281; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.study ( [213.162.120.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f4sm34084960nfh.2007.07.16.11.30.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:30:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey and saving images taking so long Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:26:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <4683D4A8.6070707@bellsouth.net> <469AE603.2060501@gmail.com> <469AFA0A.20900@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <469AFA0A.20900@bellsouth.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1625083.bGf3rtVuTr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707161826.52311.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: d5f39ced-4602-447c-a21a-13c2c47a7a9d X-Archives-Hash: 11f38166843c65be8e448877b8b3b94d --nextPart1625083.bGf3rtVuTr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 16 July 2007 05:54, Dale wrote: > I think it is a bug myself. It seems to me that there should be a limit > of some kind on this file. Maybe a time limit, size limit or > something. Me, I just hate filing bug reports. I have filed a few but > only after some serious guru > said I should. I did go search to see if one had been filed but I > didn't see one filed. [snip...] > Any thoughts from a serious guru about whether I should file this as a > bug with Seamonkey or not? I am not a guru and some would argue I am not serious either, but is there= =20 somewhere in the Mozilla settings how much cache and space for=20 entries/history it is allowed to use? I am thinking of Opera here which=20 offers you such fine tuning options. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1625083.bGf3rtVuTr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGm6pb5Fp0QerLYPcRAqgVAJ9lv4tNpHzokn9gyN/1MeEwQQgnVgCfQiLR XUXyUbjxyGP7Rn0SphiF7B0= =9LjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1625083.bGf3rtVuTr-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list