From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I8hF5-0004jV-Fd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:48:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6BIlXog032043; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:47:33 GMT Received: from smtp10.unit.tiscali.de (smtp10.unit.tiscali.de [213.205.33.46]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6BIgXtl026416 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:42:33 GMT Received: from homer_gentoo64.phheimnetz (89.57.86.220) by smtp10.unit.tiscali.de (7.3.121) (authenticated as florian.philipp@tiscali.de) id 4692B8C60003CC7F for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:42:32 +0200 From: Florian Philipp To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Absymal IDE performance with gentoo-sources-2.6.22 and why hda instead of sda? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:42:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <2262129.MyGpgaN8yZ@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <20070711095108.26fac599@pascal.spore.ath.cx> <13462767.Vc6QEx9Tan@m-id.message-center.info> In-Reply-To: <13462767.Vc6QEx9Tan@m-id.message-center.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1906446.4bbEHkpQhX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707112042.34747.f.philipp@addcom.de> X-Archives-Salt: 8170e7eb-7509-49ed-b205-99dd2ffe7d9f X-Archives-Hash: d670b2d8711068c30f7e6cfbf36a081e --nextPart1906446.4bbEHkpQhX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch 11 Juli 2007 19:53 schrieb Alexander Skwar: > =C2=B7 Dan Farrell : > > Have you considered trying with those ata kernel params turned off? > > No, I haven't. But I'll consider this first thing tomorrow morning. > Nothing bad can happen - besides an unbootable system ;) And that's > "fine". > > Thanks for this idea! > > > You seem to know what you're doing, > > Thx. > > > but I use no such parameters and > > haven't any problems. > > I think I was unable to boot without them in pre 2.6.21 times. But > maybe this has changed. I'll find out. > > Thanks again, > > Alexander Skwar > -- > I don't have any use for bodyguards, but I do have a specific use for two > highly trained certified public accountants. > -- Elvis Presley I had the same problem two days ago on my laptop. You have to deactivate al= l=20 generic drivers in your kernel. Look for stuff like generic ATA support. Th= e=20 info texts should give a hint about it being a generic driver for unsupport= ed=20 hardware. --nextPart1906446.4bbEHkpQhX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGlSSXCBEaaFO6I+ARAjv6AJ4jAMwM7+p8+Cj0GHgreJh7yE7dzgCePGJJ uqFJQIMMglUVXiUL+mAC6K8= =etbq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1906446.4bbEHkpQhX-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list