From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I8gKq-0008Ir-K7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:50:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6BHnUGh013846; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:49:30 GMT Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6BHhgqZ006880 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:43:42 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.4] (0x503eab9f.hrnxx2.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.171.159]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD77A50050 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:43:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why are some packages in portage's output bold? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:43:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20070711152817.GE26659@gogo.igglybob.com> In-Reply-To: <20070711152817.GE26659@gogo.igglybob.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2176994.VyS3Vv6EK6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200707111943.41879.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: dcf09fba-e410-4072-a8ee-5eb2ec00dc7a X-Archives-Hash: 31fee1e90167d4bb82863891201a9bac --nextPart2176994.VyS3Vv6EK6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 11 July 2007 17:28:17 Ryan Curtin wrote: > Some time ago, I noticed that whenever I ran my semi-weekly 'emerge > -uavD world', some packages were given in bold. For a while I thought > perhaps they were more system-critical packages, but upon further > investigation I could find no sort of pattern to which packages were > being bolded and which weren't. Then I thought maybe it was a local > bug, but soon thereafter some of my friends noticed the same thing in > their portage outputs. > > Does anyone know why this behavior occurs? To me it doesn't appear to > be providing any sort of useful information and only serves to confuse > me. Packages in bold are in your world file. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D142473 =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart2176994.VyS3Vv6EK6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGlRbN8/kKEzmwNNoRAi/FAJ9JI8aLlEwOXipB5fvu6xSVFbsTTwCfVIJL 5ku/11vLemSb8m2kgChJc08= =VpDd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2176994.VyS3Vv6EK6-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list