From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo Healthy? (The Return)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:10:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707032010.07281.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10707030907jaa9f524maef27beb2a7c9df@mail.gmail.com>
On Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007, Grant wrote:
> In December 2006 I started a thread titled "Is Gentoo Healthy?" in
> which I was roundly put down for raising the possibility that the
> decline in the number of Gentoo users could possibly affect the
> remaining Gentoo users in a negative way.
no.
gentoo was for a while the exciting new kid. And everybody flocked to it.
Especially 'ricers'. The 'decline' you observed is more of a pruning - the
type of users who always use the latest 'distri of the month' are gone, also
the users who really do not fit in but used gentoo because it was cool for a
while.
Every distro has that moment - ubuntu will suffer from that too.
>
> Is everyone still toeing that line? The Gentoo Weekly Newsletter
> hasn't been published in almost two months.
that is a completly different problem ;)
> Is Gentoo destined to be
> just another distro starved for contributors and struggling to stay up
> to date?
hm, couple of new devs in the last two weeks. What was your question?
> If so, I really misjudged it. The meta approach of Gentoo
> is superior to any other in my mind, and I think it's growth and
> potential are being stunted by the "we don't need them" attitude which
> perpetuates Gentoo's lack of usability features for beginners.
why should a beginner WANT to use gentoo? To get his hands dirty without being
forced to, he can start with a much more 'beginner friendly' distro.
There is no reason nor need to dumb down gentoo to fit everybody.
>
> Gentoo needs as many users as possible to reach its potential.
no. It really does not. The opposite is true. Gentoo does not need to become
another dumb 'userfriendly' distro - there are hundreds of them already. It
does not need the 'I don't want to learn anything' or 'I don't read
documentation' type of user. It does not need the standard-ubuntu-dau that
askeds the same stupid (stupid because it is explained in a sticky topic on
top of the forum) question again and again and again, because he is too lazy
to read an existing thread or use the search feature (look into the nvnews
forum for an example).
Gentoo needs users who want to use gentoo for its technical merits, not
because it is is 'cool'. We lost the 'cool distro of the month' users and it
was a good thing.
> It's a
> short-sighted mistake to think that non-contributing users do Gentoo
> no good. Non-contributing users become contributors as time passes.
> Car mechanics all start as car drivers.
There are users and users. There are users who try to help in mailing lists
and forums and file bugs. There are users who help fellow gentoo users among
their friends.
And there are the ones who do nothing at all -except complaining if something
does not work (even if it is their own fault).
Gentoo needs the first kind of users - and I would go so far to say, that it
got them. Gentoo does NOT need the second kind - and we lost a lot of them.
I call that win-win.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-03 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-03 16:07 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo Healthy? (The Return) Grant
2007-07-03 16:46 ` Mark Knecht
2007-07-03 17:14 ` Grant
2007-07-03 17:40 ` Mark Knecht
2007-07-03 17:41 ` Thierry de Coulon
2007-07-03 17:56 ` Jesús Guerrero
2007-07-03 22:00 ` [gentoo-user] " Thufir
2007-07-03 22:21 ` [gentoo-user] " Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-07-03 22:39 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-07-03 18:13 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2007-07-03 17:54 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick
2007-07-03 18:10 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2007-07-03 18:47 ` kashani
2007-07-03 19:36 ` Paul Gibbons
2007-07-04 2:46 ` Edgar Contreras
2007-07-04 6:51 ` Kent Fredric
2007-07-08 16:48 ` Grant
2007-07-08 18:15 ` Mark Knecht
2007-07-09 14:07 ` Galevsky
2007-07-12 1:06 ` Thufir
2007-07-08 21:02 ` Thufir
2007-07-04 8:27 ` Paul Waring
2007-07-04 8:33 ` Danyelle Gragsone
2007-07-04 12:03 ` Colleen Beamer
[not found] ` <20070705001359.GB4927@sympatico.ca>
[not found] ` <200707042047.07423.mcbrides9@comcast.net>
2007-07-05 1:44 ` Dale
2007-07-06 17:47 ` kashani
2007-07-07 10:11 ` [gentoo-user] " Thufir
2007-07-07 10:56 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-07-07 13:57 ` Dan Farrell
2007-07-07 16:29 ` david
2007-07-07 20:38 ` Kent Fredric
2007-07-07 14:12 ` Martin S
2007-07-07 14:16 ` Martin S
2007-07-07 16:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-07-08 9:58 ` Martin S
2007-07-08 16:40 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant
[not found] ` <20070705014010.GA26335@waltdnes.org>
2007-07-05 7:10 ` Paul Waring
2007-07-05 8:29 ` Kent Fredric
2007-07-05 13:59 ` Mark Knecht
2007-07-05 8:37 ` [gentoo-user] " Thufir
2007-07-05 11:04 ` David Relson
2007-07-06 10:12 ` [gentoo-user] " Mick
2007-07-04 9:27 ` Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707032010.07281.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox