From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HxRJ7-0007Op-HI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:34:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5AHWQaT031112; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:32:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5AHP62p021468 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:25:07 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7E6649D0 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:25:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.029 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.029 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.029] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUaP9Sr1PI0G for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABED064ACD for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.109]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJF00AEBKDS5YB0@l-daemon> for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:25:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml8so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.152]) by pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JJF00G4UKDRWDH0@pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:25:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from virgo.badcomputer.org ([68.148.98.184]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JJF006AZKDPF7I1@l-daemon> for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:25:01 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:24:46 -0600 From: darren kirby Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Kdevelop users In-reply-to: <1181468667.466bc7fbc19fe@imp.free.fr> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <200706101124.46708.bulliver@badcomputer.org> Organization: Badcomputer Org. Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <1181468667.466bc7fbc19fe@imp.free.fr> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 X-Archives-Salt: 2d9c9fa6-d120-4deb-a3da-946c67b5a5f1 X-Archives-Hash: 6c076999600cdbe4167adc80467bba5a quoth the alain.didierjean@free.fr: > I wonder if it's worth using Kdevelop for small apps with graphic > interface. Any Kdevelop users around ? How useful is it to you ? Is it hard > to learn ? Did you give up using it ? > Thanks for replying to this quick survey. > > -- > ~adj~ Guess it depends on your definition of 'small app'. If working on a project of only 1 file, ie: a quick one-off script I generally use vim or kate. It is when you start a larger project with many files that kdevelop starts to pay off. I like the CVS integration. Very nice.... Of course you can spend all your time clicking buttons and viewing all the options rather than writing code ;) -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list