From: Florian Philipp <f.philipp@addcom.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 10:14:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706091014.20907.f.philipp@addcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1181348732.25635.28.camel@blackwidow.nbk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1468 bytes --]
Am Samstag 09 Juni 2007 02:25 schrieb Albert Hopkins:
> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 19:01 -0500, jamesc@reliant-data.com wrote:
> > On Fri Jun 8 16:38 , Dale <dalek@exceedtech.net> sent:
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's me, I do exactly the same until you issue the cp command
> > where I do: $>cd /mnt/oldstuff && tar cvjpf /pathtosomewhere/mystuff.tbz
> > ./
> > and then extract to the new directory. I do this out of habit mostly
> > and, yes, it is a useless step unless you want to store a copy somewhere
> > for whatever reason...
> >
> > --James
>
> The one thing I mentioned is that I actually pipe tar to tar (tar -c ...
>
> | tar -x ...) which seems even more useless, but as I said I'm used to
>
> doing some things out of habit. Then I thought about why: the '-a' flag
> is not available on all *nices... I believe it's a GNU extension. So I
> probably got used to using the tar trick on a non-GNU system and got
> used to it because it works whether I'm using Linux or not. But if
> you're on a Linux system (that has rsync installed) then rsync is
> probably the nicer option. It's got even more options than GNU's cp. I
> actually 'alias cp="rsync"' on my Gentoo systems.
>
> 'dd' is good if you want to preserve filesystem/geometry but not good if
> you don't.
> --
> Albert W. Hopkins
I wouldn't recommend dd, either. Using dd you would preserve all the
fragmentation of the old file system while cp, tar and rsync don't.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-09 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-09 0:01 [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition jamesc
2007-06-09 0:25 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-06-09 8:14 ` Florian Philipp [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-09 0:43 jamesc
2007-06-09 0:18 jamesc
2007-06-08 16:52 burlingk
2007-06-08 16:40 burlingk
2007-06-08 15:05 Aleksey Kunitskiy
2007-06-08 15:18 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-08 15:48 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-06-08 15:59 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-06-08 16:21 ` Aleksey Kunitskiy
2007-06-08 16:43 ` Tim Allingham
2007-06-08 18:52 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-09 18:25 ` Tim Allingham
2007-06-11 7:24 ` Mick
2007-06-11 8:58 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-11 15:18 ` Randy Barlow
2007-06-11 14:54 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-06-11 15:00 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-08 22:38 ` Dale
[not found] ` <200706081839.07324.alexey.kv@gmail.com>
2007-06-08 15:59 ` Mauro Faccenda
2007-06-08 15:54 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-06-08 16:01 ` Mauro Faccenda
2007-06-08 18:09 ` Benno Schulenberg
2007-06-09 8:45 ` Vladimir Rusinov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706091014.20907.f.philipp@addcom.de \
--to=f.philipp@addcom.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox