From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HwurB-0005bw-P7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 06:55:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l596sDQA006128; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 06:54:13 GMT Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l596o0ut001428 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 06:50:00 GMT Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so296216ana for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ixyaAnwYhtkbEFTxcie/5o8OHyq8116vaLqTZOvBCg/tTWXlhGewzermaQi2I0LXxhI7XuttgiAWYCHsc68/sKvG59hb1zTRSQZjNu+aVZsEGxqIO/MNWsPqM6WmpVTcyLBQ6hF2MeY1byi7uG3Ksc8xt/D1/mrs5VOuxLgjBC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=eDi9FSSav/shSvq5Vao75PQ4cpeI3a4lcMybbsboVMyGom/Crj+wUxGQU23i99O58JcVXxAdQviWKbGS+zjomprpv+sEIskyzgJ6NSGXyZtIwkmZdWf2r3BtxhtyZDsRFilZ4s/Ih0sbddfHSsTAmWdsh5dPblFt+LhDqqubOCo= Received: by 10.100.167.7 with SMTP id p7mr2207042ane.1181371797596; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.100? ( [71.116.41.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12sm4091569and.2007.06.08.23.49.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:49:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Zachary Grafton Organization: Severant, Inc. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 02:49:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200706062034.23922.davividal@siscompar.com.br> <200706090129.37942.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: <200706090129.37942.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706090249.50881.zachary.grafton@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 7a7eb3ee-a916-4f9c-b3da-05d272950eee X-Archives-Hash: e48730626a85226a6635a0483f609111 On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, =BBQ=AB wrote: > > In , > > > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" wrote: > > > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > b.n. wrote: > > > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get > > > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. > > > > > > > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? > > > > > > I did. > > > > > > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized the > > > bug as a real bug... > > > > I've seen that happen a few times. IME, jakub is usually right, but > > whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn. It's possible to > > wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it, > > instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices. > > Jakub is like a spam filter who filters out 100% of the spam. Sadly, he > filters a fair amount of ham too - and if your ham got filtered the option > to get it recognized as ham are hard to find and not easy to use ;) > > His user interface could be improved.... Maybe someone should submit a bug report.... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list