Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

[Zachary Grafton <zachary.grafton@gmail.com>]

On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote:
> > In <news:200706081440.37381.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>,
> >
> > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:
> > > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > > > b.n. <brullonulla@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get
> > > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub?
> > >
> > > I did.
> > >
> > > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized the
> > > bug as a real bug...
> >
> > I've seen that happen a few times.  IME, jakub is usually right, but
> > whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn.  It's possible to
> > wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it,
> > instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices.
>
> Jakub is like a spam filter who filters out 100% of the spam. Sadly, he
> filters a fair amount of ham too - and if your ham got filtered the option
> to get it recognized as ham are hard to find and not easy to use ;)
>
> His user interface could be improved....

Maybe someone should submit a bug report....
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list