From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hwnz4-0002fi-OG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:35:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l58NXrkw002484; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 23:33:53 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l58NTe0f030177 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 23:29:40 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F2162061FF for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 01:29:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122502061C9 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 01:29:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTPSA id 23961427 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 01:29:39 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 01:29:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200706062034.23922.davividal@siscompar.com.br> <200706081440.37381.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706090129.37942.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 3eb88881-5723-49ac-9ab2-deca91af1ee4 X-Archives-Hash: af586d942459cdb59659acfaf2d5cc5c On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, =BBQ=AB wrote: > In , > > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" wrote: > > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > b.n. wrote: > > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get > > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. > > > > > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? > > > > I did. > > > > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized the > > bug as a real bug... > > I've seen that happen a few times. IME, jakub is usually right, but > whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn. It's possible to > wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it, > instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices. Jakub is like a spam filter who filters out 100% of the spam. Sadly, he=20 filters a fair amount of ham too - and if your ham got filtered the option = to=20 get it recognized as ham are hard to find and not easy to use ;) His user interface could be improved.... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list