public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:51:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070607125143.GA11340@nibiru.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706070234.02530.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>

* Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:

> > I'm some bit confused that the wranglers should do such decisions
> > at all (if they're not also involved in the affected package).
> 
> because it is their job to filter out noise so 'real' devs can 
> concentrate on the 'real' bugs. They are the first line of defence. 

Oh, funny, devs have to be defended from users ?

This really reminds me on the behaviour of some great German Telco. 
They defend their techs (who often are really good folks) by stupid 
callcenter people who can do almost nothing. The new management has 
recognized that such extreamly bad service had cost about a million
of customers and so changes that. (yeah, I didn't belive it first,
but they're now really trying to do good service) ...

> And since bug wranglers are humans, they can't know everything 
> and sometimes they make a mistake.

Of course. And I don't blame them for doing some mistake.
The problem is that it happens virtually everytime. I don't know if
it only affects my bugs which are declared invalid per default.

It would be really okay, if the wrangler says: "please provide
more information" or "the patch makes trouble with [...]" etc. 
And if some makes an error, could simply say one word: sorry.
This would be an normal discussion, as civilized people used to do.

> Bug wranglers are the first filter, if the bug is not assigned 
> to a team. And sometimes, they filter things, that should not be 
> filtered out. Stay calm, explain the situation - 

Once, I did. But that did not work. I was titled stupid, my issues
were declared invalid and I was told to go away.

> But having a fit on this ml does not help anybody - 

For me, it helps. I just want to tell the public what's going on.
After that I feel better. If anything changes then is unimportant 
at this point ;-P

And of course I inform people of my fixes. If they're interested, 
they can pick 'em, otherwise simply ignore me. 

> it just looks bad. And it makes YOU look bad.

I dont care. It totally irrelevant to me, if I look good or bad 
in such an unimportant area like b.g.o.

All that matters is that I get my problems solved as quick and
easy as possible. And of course I like to give my works on OSS
back to the community. 


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-07 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-05 15:07 [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-05 15:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 21:51   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 22:01     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 23:10       ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  0:34         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 12:51           ` Enrico Weigelt [this message]
2007-06-07 15:39             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07  7:11         ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2007-06-07  7:10     ` Alexander Skwar
2007-06-05 15:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 17:46   ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-06 22:03   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  2:58     ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-06-07 13:20     ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 16:07 ` felix
2007-06-05 23:56   ` b.n.
2007-06-06 21:59     ` felix
2007-06-07 23:16       ` b.n.
2007-06-08  8:20         ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 23:28           ` b.n.
2007-06-08 21:17             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-08 22:34               ` [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid) Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-06-08 23:16                 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  4:41                   ` [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil b.n.
2007-06-09  2:32                     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  9:58                 ` Mick
2007-06-09 13:02                   ` b.n.
2007-06-12 14:45                 ` [gentoo-user] How much patching is good for an distro ? (WAS: Ubuntu isn't the devil) Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09  9:13             ` [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Kent Fredric
2007-06-11  8:36               ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-11 13:18                 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 14:48                   ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Dan Farrell
2007-06-14  1:39                     ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-06  7:14 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06  2:55 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-06-06 23:00 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 23:34 Davi
2007-06-07  0:01 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 23:21   ` b.n.
2007-06-08 14:04     ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:25       ` b.n.
2007-06-12 17:08         ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 19:25           ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-07  2:04 burlingk
2007-06-07  7:01 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 13:40   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:40     ` b.n.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070607125143.GA11340@nibiru.local \
    --to=weigelt@metux.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox