From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 00:01:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706070001.07084.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070606215129.GA2575@nibiru.local>
On Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > so first you went to the wrong bugzilla and made a big fuss.
> > Then you went to the gentoo-bugzilla and made even more fuss.
>
> Yes, I first expected it to be an firefox bug, so I filed the bug there.
> After I found out that the ff source didn't contain that error message,
> I had I look elsewhere and learned that it's produced by an Gentoo
> specific script coming from another package. So I filed the bug there.
>
> BTW: what do you exactly mean with "made a big fuss" ?
>
> > And in less than a day you have concluded that nobody is interessted
> > in your problem or patch.
>
> Yes, because certain (responsible) people directly expressed it to me,
> again (as usual).
>
> <snip>
>
> > You are really fast - but have you ever tried to create a NEW PROFILE
> > WITH THE CORRECT DIR INSTEAD OF SYMLINKS? NO?
>
> That's far, far away from my problem. I do not need any new profile,
> and the profile is okay. The symlinks have to be there, explicitly.
> Firefox does not have any slightest problem with that. (why should it ?)
> It's Gentoo's "mozilla-launcher", which introduces that problem.
>
> > Just start firefox with firefox -Profilemanager
>
> And then ?
> Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ?
no? but if it works that way, it is not even defective..
>
> > Oh, and retry. Maybe adding the author of mozilla-launcher to the bug?
>
> Do I have permission for that ? That's new to me.
>
> > Because, you know, the bugwranglers aren't perfect-all-knowing persons
> > - and you are so smart, you should be able to find the dev who is
> > responsible for mozilla-launcher...
>
> Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate bugs to the
> responsible persons ?
and bug wranglers are just humans. And humans a) are not perfect and b)
sometimes make errors.
>
> Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of specific
> persons ;-O
well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes them too
fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a civil manner usually
solves that.
>
> > For the rest - a typical Enrico-mail. Please don't stop. Go on, nothing
> > to see here.
>
> Yeah, I already know you don't like me. I dont care.
no, I don't like the manner you regularly make a lot of noise about nothing.
I don't know you, so I can't know if I like you or not.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-06 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-05 15:07 [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-05 15:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 21:51 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 22:01 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2007-06-06 23:10 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 0:34 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 12:51 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 15:39 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 7:11 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2007-06-07 7:10 ` Alexander Skwar
2007-06-05 15:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 17:46 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-06 22:03 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 2:58 ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-06-07 13:20 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 16:07 ` felix
2007-06-05 23:56 ` b.n.
2007-06-06 21:59 ` felix
2007-06-07 23:16 ` b.n.
2007-06-08 8:20 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 23:28 ` b.n.
2007-06-08 21:17 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-08 22:34 ` [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid) Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-06-08 23:16 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09 4:41 ` [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil b.n.
2007-06-09 2:32 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09 9:58 ` Mick
2007-06-09 13:02 ` b.n.
2007-06-12 14:45 ` [gentoo-user] How much patching is good for an distro ? (WAS: Ubuntu isn't the devil) Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09 9:13 ` [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 8:36 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-11 13:18 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 14:48 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Dan Farrell
2007-06-14 1:39 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-06 7:14 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06 2:55 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-06-06 23:00 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 23:34 Davi
2007-06-07 0:01 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 23:21 ` b.n.
2007-06-08 14:04 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:25 ` b.n.
2007-06-12 17:08 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 19:25 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-07 2:04 burlingk
2007-06-07 7:01 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 13:40 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:40 ` b.n.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706070001.07084.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox