From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw4m7-00067F-8h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:18:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l56NGjMc012139; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:16:45 GMT Received: from s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (s15216962.onlinehome-server.info [217.160.22.205]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l56NBd6i006331 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:11:44 GMT Received: (from uucp@localhost) by s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (8.13.3/8.13.3/SuSE Linux 0.7) with UUCP id l56NCCeU019746 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:12:12 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id l56NATcQ024803 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:10:29 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:10:29 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Message-ID: <20070606231029.GD2575@nibiru.local> References: <20070605150742.GB7993@nibiru.local> <200706051745.59977.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <20070606215129.GA2575@nibiru.local> <200706070001.07084.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706070001.07084.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof X-Archives-Salt: 03692580-ef71-48b6-abdd-4e2a763d3797 X-Archives-Hash: 4ee8b58199df1943867ee4e26e2ab2ec * Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > And then ? > > Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ? > > no? but if it works that way, it is not even defective.. It doesn't. Why do you assume it would ? > > Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate > > bugs to the responsible persons ? > > and bug wranglers are just humans. And humans a) are not perfect > and b) sometimes make errors. Ok, no problem. But is that the fault of the reporter ? Obviously not. If a bug gets to the wrong dev, he simply kicks it back or directly to the right person. Trivial. > > Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of > > specific persons ;-O > > well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes > them too fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a > civil manner usually solves that. I'm some bit confused that the wranglers should do such decisions at all (if they're not also involved in the affected package). cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list