Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

[Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>]

* Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:


> > And then ?
> > Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ?
> 
> no? but if it works that way, it is not even defective..

It doesn't. Why do you assume it would ? 

<snip>

> > Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate 
> > bugs to the responsible persons ?
> 
> and bug wranglers are just humans. And humans a) are not perfect 
> and b) sometimes make errors.

Ok, no problem. But is that the fault of the reporter ? Obviously not.
If a bug gets to the wrong dev, he simply kicks it back or directly
to the right person. Trivial.

> > Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of 
> > specific persons ;-O
> 
> well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes 
> them too fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a 
> civil manner usually solves that.

I'm some bit confused that the wranglers should do such decisions 
at all (if they're not also involved in the affected package).


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list