public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: felix@crowfix.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:59:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070606215938.GA20041@crowfix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4665F834.3000302@gmail.com>

Complaining TWICE worked.  The problem I complained about shouldn't
have happened in the first place; someonex fixed something that wasn't
broken and made it broken.

Your response is absolutely typical of my problem with the gentoo dev
community.  You misstate a complaint, overreact to it, and apparently
feel pretty smug about your accomplishment.  No one will admit to the
two screwups (first breaking a working ebuild, second incorrectly
closing a bug on it).  Instead you lash out at those who point out
problems.

Yes, I had the wrong program when I compalined about the color
problem.  But the gentoo community response then as now was to lash
out, scream and shout, not to actually investigate.  And when I
finally left the thread alone, you geniuses were still ranting about
it three days later when I next checked.

You folks may think you have a cool system, and it is in some ways and
could be in many others.  But I know many people who tried gentoo and
bailed precisely because of the shoot the messenger mentality so
pervasive here; the self-selected sample you see is meaningless.

Go ahead, have another three days' fun.  Maybe I'll spark some more
tinders in a month or two.  I wouldn't want to deprive you of your
fun.

-- 
            ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
     Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-06 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-05 15:07 [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-05 15:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 21:51   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 22:01     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 23:10       ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  0:34         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 12:51           ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 15:39             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07  7:11         ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2007-06-07  7:10     ` Alexander Skwar
2007-06-05 15:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 17:46   ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-06 22:03   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  2:58     ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-06-07 13:20     ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 16:07 ` felix
2007-06-05 23:56   ` b.n.
2007-06-06 21:59     ` felix [this message]
2007-06-07 23:16       ` b.n.
2007-06-08  8:20         ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 23:28           ` b.n.
2007-06-08 21:17             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-08 22:34               ` [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid) Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-06-08 23:16                 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  4:41                   ` [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil b.n.
2007-06-09  2:32                     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  9:58                 ` Mick
2007-06-09 13:02                   ` b.n.
2007-06-12 14:45                 ` [gentoo-user] How much patching is good for an distro ? (WAS: Ubuntu isn't the devil) Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09  9:13             ` [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Kent Fredric
2007-06-11  8:36               ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-11 13:18                 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 14:48                   ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Dan Farrell
2007-06-14  1:39                     ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-06  7:14 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06  2:55 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-06-06 23:00 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 23:34 Davi
2007-06-07  0:01 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 23:21   ` b.n.
2007-06-08 14:04     ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:25       ` b.n.
2007-06-12 17:08         ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 19:25           ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-07  2:04 burlingk
2007-06-07  7:01 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 13:40   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:40     ` b.n.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070606215938.GA20041@crowfix.com \
    --to=felix@crowfix.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox