public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:51:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070606215129.GA2575@nibiru.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706051745.59977.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>

* Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:

<snip>
 
> so first you went to the wrong bugzilla and made a big fuss.
> Then you went to the gentoo-bugzilla and made even more fuss.

Yes, I first expected it to be an firefox bug, so I filed the bug there.
After I found out that the ff source didn't contain that error message,
I had I look elsewhere and learned that it's produced by an Gentoo 
specific script coming from another package. So I filed the bug there.

BTW: what do you exactly mean with "made a big fuss" ? 

> And in less than a day you have concluded that nobody is interessted 
> in your problem or patch.

Yes, because certain (responsible) people directly expressed it to me,
again (as usual).

<snip>
 
> You are really fast - but have you ever tried to create a NEW PROFILE 
> WITH THE CORRECT DIR INSTEAD OF SYMLINKS? NO?

That's far, far away from my problem. I do not need any new profile, 
and the profile is okay. The symlinks have to be there, explicitly.
Firefox does not have any slightest problem with that. (why should it ?)
It's Gentoo's "mozilla-launcher", which introduces that problem. 

> Just start firefox with firefox -Profilemanager

And then ? 
Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ?

> Oh, and retry. Maybe adding the author of mozilla-launcher to the bug?

Do I have permission for that ? That's new to me.
 
> Because, you know, the bugwranglers aren't perfect-all-knowing persons 
> - and you are so smart, you should be able to find the dev who is responsible 
> for mozilla-launcher...

Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate bugs to the
responsible persons ? 

Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of specific 
persons ;-O
 
> For the rest - a typical Enrico-mail. Please don't stop. Go on, nothing 
> to see here.

Yeah, I already know you don't like me. I dont care.


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-06 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-05 15:07 [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-05 15:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 21:51   ` Enrico Weigelt [this message]
2007-06-06 22:01     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 23:10       ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  0:34         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 12:51           ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 15:39             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07  7:11         ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2007-06-07  7:10     ` Alexander Skwar
2007-06-05 15:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 17:46   ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-06 22:03   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  2:58     ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-06-07 13:20     ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 16:07 ` felix
2007-06-05 23:56   ` b.n.
2007-06-06 21:59     ` felix
2007-06-07 23:16       ` b.n.
2007-06-08  8:20         ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 23:28           ` b.n.
2007-06-08 21:17             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-08 22:34               ` [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid) Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-06-08 23:16                 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  4:41                   ` [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil b.n.
2007-06-09  2:32                     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  9:58                 ` Mick
2007-06-09 13:02                   ` b.n.
2007-06-12 14:45                 ` [gentoo-user] How much patching is good for an distro ? (WAS: Ubuntu isn't the devil) Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09  9:13             ` [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Kent Fredric
2007-06-11  8:36               ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-11 13:18                 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 14:48                   ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Dan Farrell
2007-06-14  1:39                     ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-06  7:14 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06  2:55 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-06-06 23:00 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 23:34 Davi
2007-06-07  0:01 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 23:21   ` b.n.
2007-06-08 14:04     ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:25       ` b.n.
2007-06-12 17:08         ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 19:25           ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-07  2:04 burlingk
2007-06-07  7:01 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 13:40   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:40     ` b.n.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070606215129.GA2575@nibiru.local \
    --to=weigelt@metux.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox