public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@web.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:48:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070605174817.7411ba70.hilse@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070605150742.GB7993@nibiru.local>

Hi,

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 17:07:42 +0200
Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote:

> just as I thought, certain folks had their lessons now it's 
> maybe worth contributing someting, it starts again: 
> Critical bugs are simply declared invalid. 
> 
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180935
> 
> Again the old philosophy "what I don't understand is invalid".
> 
> Obviously my contributions are unwelcomed, so I closed the bug.
> 
> BTW, I've already fixed it. If anyone's *seriously* interested,
> give a note. Evrything else is a waste of my time.

Well, since your awesome efforts last time, everyone here already knows
you're the most polite bug reporter, absolutely fair and waiting long
enough for the bug wranglers to catch up, answering nicely to their
statements and that you're always correct. Your solution to that bug
was charming and short: Dump what you didn't see making sense (is that
what you said about things being "invalid"?) -- instead of complicated
solutions like e.g. using readlink(1) and keeping at least the
functionality in there.

-hwh

PS: free sarcasm for everyone, just pick your favorite above. And sorry
for adding to the inevitable noise.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-05 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-05 15:07 [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-05 15:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 21:51   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 22:01     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 23:10       ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  0:34         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 12:51           ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 15:39             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07  7:11         ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2007-06-07  7:10     ` Alexander Skwar
2007-06-05 15:48 ` Hans-Werner Hilse [this message]
2007-06-05 17:46   ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-06 22:03   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07  2:58     ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-06-07 13:20     ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 16:07 ` felix
2007-06-05 23:56   ` b.n.
2007-06-06 21:59     ` felix
2007-06-07 23:16       ` b.n.
2007-06-08  8:20         ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 23:28           ` b.n.
2007-06-08 21:17             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-08 22:34               ` [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid) Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-06-08 23:16                 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  4:41                   ` [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil b.n.
2007-06-09  2:32                     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09  9:58                 ` Mick
2007-06-09 13:02                   ` b.n.
2007-06-12 14:45                 ` [gentoo-user] How much patching is good for an distro ? (WAS: Ubuntu isn't the devil) Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09  9:13             ` [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Kent Fredric
2007-06-11  8:36               ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-11 13:18                 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 14:48                   ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Dan Farrell
2007-06-14  1:39                     ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-06  7:14 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06  2:55 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-06-06 23:00 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 23:34 Davi
2007-06-07  0:01 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 23:21   ` b.n.
2007-06-08 14:04     ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:25       ` b.n.
2007-06-12 17:08         ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 19:25           ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-07  2:04 burlingk
2007-06-07  7:01 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 13:40   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:40     ` b.n.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070605174817.7411ba70.hilse@web.de \
    --to=hilse@web.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox