From: felix@crowfix.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:07:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070605160739.GA21746@crowfix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070605150742.GB7993@nibiru.local>
I see complaints about the bug reporting style, but no mea culpas. I
had an experience with gentoo bugs recently which confirms his
experience on a smaller level. The apache ebuilds used to recognize
USERDIR to override the default "public_html" value. The 2.4 ebuilds
discarded that for no reason. I filed a bug which was promptly closed
for no good reason, only the bogus answer that the new configuraion
files layout took care of it. I reopened it with a more detailed
description of the problem and included the URL of the apache
documentation which explains that the suexec binary has to be compiled
with the USERDIR values known at compile time. A week later, the bug
was properly closed with a better solution than the old 2.2 solution,
and a more permanent solution than my home grown work around.
Some may remember me from whining a month or two ago about the
atrocious color philosophy with emerge. The reaction both times from
the gentoo community was merely a repeat of what I have come to expect
from several years of my own and from friends' and colleagues'
experiences: blame the messenger. Lash out at the poster, don't
bother to even investigate the problem. When in doubt, scream and
shout, run in circles, pull a pout.
I seldom complain any more. It's not worth the hassle and feedback,
and it accomplishes nothing. The gentoo developers have enough bad
eggs to tasint everybody. There are plenty of good eggs, but they
need to speak up and stop the bad eggs from ruining their reputation.
I liken it to cops: as long as the good ones won't turn in the bad
ones for framing people, taking bribes, and general corrupt practices,
the good cops are going to be tarred with the same brush as the bad
ones.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-05 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-05 15:07 [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-05 15:45 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 21:51 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 22:01 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-06 23:10 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 0:34 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 12:51 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 15:39 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-07 7:11 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
2007-06-07 7:10 ` Alexander Skwar
2007-06-05 15:48 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 17:46 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-06 22:03 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 2:58 ` [gentoo-user] " »Q«
2007-06-07 13:20 ` [gentoo-user] " Hans-Werner Hilse
2007-06-05 16:07 ` felix [this message]
2007-06-05 23:56 ` b.n.
2007-06-06 21:59 ` felix
2007-06-07 23:16 ` b.n.
2007-06-08 8:20 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 23:28 ` b.n.
2007-06-08 21:17 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-08 22:34 ` [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil (was: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid) Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-06-08 23:16 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09 4:41 ` [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Ubuntu isn't the devil b.n.
2007-06-09 2:32 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-06-09 9:58 ` Mick
2007-06-09 13:02 ` b.n.
2007-06-12 14:45 ` [gentoo-user] How much patching is good for an distro ? (WAS: Ubuntu isn't the devil) Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-09 9:13 ` [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 8:36 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-11 13:18 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-11 14:48 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Dan Farrell
2007-06-14 1:39 ` Iain Buchanan
2007-06-06 7:14 ` [gentoo-user] " Alexander Skwar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-06 2:55 [gentoo-user] " burlingk
2007-06-06 23:00 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-06 23:34 Davi
2007-06-07 0:01 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-07 23:21 ` b.n.
2007-06-08 14:04 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:25 ` b.n.
2007-06-12 17:08 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-12 19:25 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-07 2:04 burlingk
2007-06-07 7:01 ` Kent Fredric
2007-06-08 13:40 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-06-08 23:40 ` b.n.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070605160739.GA21746@crowfix.com \
--to=felix@crowfix.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox