From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HvWfD-0005gS-9l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:53:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l55AqBO3009578; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:52:11 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l55Am0su004919 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:48:00 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id F3DF5206513 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:47:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D1020638F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:47:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.197.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTPSA id 23865166 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:47:58 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] alternatives to audacious? Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:47:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20070604174247.7d4b9d7c@pascal.spore.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706051247.56284.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: e69979d4-30f7-47ac-8d98-0d298455d32e X-Archives-Hash: 2b976e163aa162f2c758e98134c1d509 On Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007, Denis wrote: > > Amarok is feature-rich, but heavy indeed. I don't recommend it for a > > drop-in XMMS replacement. If you like the idea of editing mp3 tags and > > organzing your music really nicely, browsing it 3 different ways and > > seeing cover art from amazon.com and such, amarok is for you. > > Ha... yea, my use flags have "-gnome" and "-kde" in them, and I run a > very simple fluxbox environment... I just want the music player to > have a decent graphical interface, but just the essential features, > without bloat. > > It seems like I got the Audacious to work... But I still miss the XMMS ;-) alsaplayer? it is small, fast, you can run douzends of instances at the same time. Play forwards, backwards, at a lot of different speeds - and it has even a playlist. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list