From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HtuoL-0006hV-Pk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:16:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l510EqFm029612; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:14:52 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5108k19021071 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:08:47 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so4890nfh for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 17:08:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:x-pgp-fingerprint:x-gpg-key:x-editor:user-agent; b=p53vx35Hrhure+wYT+8v+hxbCvd2oX2jovbKZsyQPwoBz1NXh0/aoKHz09mRDFaINQzbtv0/8S2+f3Wt3sJ9RzNbJKJQe0FB5HysRkqs7Dc2iOKH6bxvmHG4FAaJkdefw0jH9X9ykyPOi/JWUkJd9C1RhOiVuYRCrlZVZzAFm7w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:x-pgp-fingerprint:x-gpg-key:x-editor:user-agent; b=UkKar05sEQUAIMfTgvXdIXJJNCXxC57Ppcd+ufFWZSiA4ilpCCVjXxepuWZV6YKXgA8j5DMFrJFupvfypUDdz4PFA7FDgk4ldljulJJWBM1ifr2jCZY3R7ChpCg+vu6iIx0hR1DMSi/6pbTJf2KF9bxmv9yZBGK+XsKfuzXN8bY= Received: by 10.82.136.4 with SMTP id j4mr678887bud.1180656524829; Thu, 31 May 2007 17:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mars ( [160.75.118.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5sm585619nfh.2007.05.31.17.08.42; Thu, 31 May 2007 17:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mars (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A2641B7B4; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 02:32:56 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 02:32:56 +0300 From: Ali Polatel To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 Message-ID: <20070531233255.GA22389@mars.solar> References: <1180645468.344505@rumba> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1180645468.344505@rumba> X-PGP-Fingerprint: DBC2 2BC7 95B8 6D6C 8BC3 37EC CA00 CFC1 8E72 4EDC X-GPG-Key: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net 8E724EDC X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (Linux 2.6.21-suspend2-r5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l510EqG6029612 X-Archives-Salt: c0703190-feca-4cfa-bbe1-30b5837838f3 X-Archives-Hash: 896e1cd52422af4108da662f8dae3267 Konstantinos Agouros yazm=C4=B1=C5=9F: > Hi, >=20 > will there be a unionfs for 2.6.20 kernels? AFAIK there's only the 1.5_= pre > for 2.6.19. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Konstantin You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel. Have a look at http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html for more info.. --=20 ali polatel (hawking) There are more old drunkards than old doctors. --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list