From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HrSSN-00050R-BR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 05:35:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4P5Y36R006778; Fri, 25 May 2007 05:34:03 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4P5Sd7v000380 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 05:28:39 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so216972uge for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 22:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=ntykmsQyQz7ug0CuCPyWjH3lTHmmQbT9vn7arCk47rgwL+X/Epla3K/dHIQXKKv4NhEMDE3bBld9zMLBHljkKUX7YR+jVJdV5jjmvXKxXPOodERoznzcA20czvuwcT8oUfBr1Wy/uooKAd8Z2o3aBNIxmpiHawqZSSYU8HlvluQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=HL5nR1FM/mDylWAuWHDt9lmr9AIgMKUyZ3PfkWUMZyxGKKqQJuf44sHP/Yt3QGBtEuWxzwJkYZH8loR4A3hJbJUgMGS8jrCC3Nw9BxydUHiWF+exXHLed/lsfIcWMAwPNu/PoIUgf+GN9VbP15py6qsE5tV2u6Da05UMSAL1RI4= Received: by 10.67.101.8 with SMTP id d8mr2686723ugm.1180070918903; Thu, 24 May 2007 22:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pender.cb.ac.at ( [193.170.53.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm5745940ugf.2007.05.24.22.28.38; Thu, 24 May 2007 22:28:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Roman Zimmermann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] sharing portage directories when dual booting x86 and amd64 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 07:28:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <465629DA.4000000@burnieanglican.org.au> In-Reply-To: <465629DA.4000000@burnieanglican.org.au> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart56200104.tbcxrHT2BT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705250728.36155.mereandor@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 129864c9-5a28-4a02-8627-08f85e91c9ba X-Archives-Hash: ce0ddc39a73432e9d876bb31e6a65b8f --nextPart56200104.tbcxrHT2BT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Will Briggs wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: > > I have a core 2 duo (dell 6400), which is currently running x86. > > I am thinking of setting up another partition and dual booting amd64. > > .... Not all Core 2 > Duo's in 6400's are. I have a T2400 processor in my 6400 which is not > em64t enabled. Not that I mind - plenty quick enough in 32-bit mode. That's not entirely true: _All_ Core 2 Duo processors have the 64bit=20 instruction sets. Your T2400 is not a "Core 2 Duo", it's a "Core Duo". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_2) Roman --nextPart56200104.tbcxrHT2BT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGVnQEIAIA2PPsul0RAjn/AJ9LIwb/5IeH5YbdKj7PUpSUtpjgAgCgoJRp sf2SjZfQXfRVlEkc6PiAYFQ= =moy3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart56200104.tbcxrHT2BT-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list