From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hp8pa-0000bJ-T6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 May 2007 20:13:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4IKC35J025738; Fri, 18 May 2007 20:12:03 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4IK7U4E020777 for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 20:07:30 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so520793ugc for ; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:07:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=HbrhQVsMmArnXnvWuFIflRG3u1iVE4ptAAkGmoxuDyBqXT1XvwB3Opbkh4FL2LqiHlYWEVUwwWufELtB47/ABf0A0NnUWxXFlqKDrD1DhMZKXXeU6vg/RA2k3J2QDdLnQsEq0E0JjwJ5avmDEdqoYCVnGP4bJabjoIw53OvEkkE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=L7n8bXkr5VQRIDsn0yOZlM25Af1vrZa09DlLcCyRO4ADzxB0EICR7cYc9rwV6iNsX4xgUz10QGelbXa1Ml23Td4JqnGhPoeD8PYJyG7dxFM8XxQATDcUF1Mp9Qz8l2OGOlYGnsvYAzAIWsQoePGvfv2LOeTZkMaSTYOyp3FxKYk= Received: by 10.66.219.11 with SMTP id r11mr1284631ugg.1179518849810; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.study ( [213.162.120.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1sm1968694ugc.2007.05.18.13.07.29; Fri, 18 May 2007 13:07:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Boa is now hard masked? Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 21:07:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200705181640.40971.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <200705181710.44050.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <200705181815.31240.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> In-Reply-To: <200705181815.31240.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8085668.Wj8R6Hq342"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705182107.12721.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 9f1c78ab-7597-49c4-9773-2ed533f8ab69 X-Archives-Hash: 6b77a6c4841891df03fe6750d4e261fe --nextPart8085668.Wj8R6Hq342 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 18 May 2007 17:15, Bo =C3=98rsted Andresen wrote: > On Friday 18 May 2007 18:10:41 Mick wrote: > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "boa" have been masked. > > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your > > request: - www-servers/boa-0.94.14_alpha20 (masked by: package.mask, ~x= 86 > > keyword) # Ra=C3=83=C2=BAl Porcel (18 May 2007) > > # For treecleaners, bug 102174 > > # Pending removal 17 Jul 2007 > > So there is your answer. I looked in anoncvs but it hasn't reached that > either yet... ;) =46air do's. Took some time to look at the bug and it seems that thttpd is= =20 suggested as a valid replacement which unlike continues to be maintained. @Neil: I haven't looked much into NFS because it seems more involved (runni= ng=20 portmap also has security aspects to consider) than just running a little=20 server every now and then - but may be I'm wrong. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart8085668.Wj8R6Hq342 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGTgdw5Fp0QerLYPcRAqcmAJ4tRZCAS5enM6XySpBx6OMiE2BmmACgtfIY fBA29BANPlbOspmu7ZkfJUQ= =qtsB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8085668.Wj8R6Hq342-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list