From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hm64Z-0001UR-6F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 10:40:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4AAdB0t005188; Thu, 10 May 2007 10:39:11 GMT Received: from desiato.localdomain (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4AAYpEg000569 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 10:34:51 GMT Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863A012AC94 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 11:34:50 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:34:46 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Separate /usr Message-ID: <20070510113446.7fdae1b8@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200705101211.34696.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10705081656s776f28f5kbe497a5326107c2f@mail.gmail.com> <3103632.vvIsoWeEWl@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> <20070510104016.360d3a97@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <200705101211.34696.benno.schulenberg@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2cvs4 (GTK+ 2.10.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_PYxVyqgfm3nMByYTQ6=dbY_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 3615846b-54b8-471a-a8d9-379af9a6d0ea X-Archives-Hash: d7b994a82ced9f873e9301aa3afec01d --Sig_PYxVyqgfm3nMByYTQ6=dbY_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:11:34 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > > No idea, but I tried it when I encountered that page and portage > > operations were measurably faster. =20 >=20 > That might well be just the transfer effect: you went from an old=20 > fragmented file system to a fresh unfragmented one. I allowed for that. I created a new filesystem for /usr/portage - I had been using a directory in /usr before. --=20 Neil Bothwick "DOOM ", said Pooh, and Slaughtered Christopher Robin with a chainsaw --Sig_PYxVyqgfm3nMByYTQ6=dbY_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGQvVKum4al0N1GQMRAlm9AJ9TbAk2u1ypi4qYX8mfaNKfHEPXwQCfWVNq 1CkhOJNaNcDxvut+HKT19wI= =GfbB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_PYxVyqgfm3nMByYTQ6=dbY_-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list