From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hm5El-0006G5-HX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:47:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4A9jb8w002104; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:45:37 GMT Received: from desiato.localdomain (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4A9eLL0027936 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:40:21 GMT Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.2]) by desiato.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82EF12AC81 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 10:40:20 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:40:16 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Separate /usr Message-ID: <20070510104016.360d3a97@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3103632.vvIsoWeEWl@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> References: <49bf44f10705081656s776f28f5kbe497a5326107c2f@mail.gmail.com> <200705091549.45764.bulliver@badcomputer.org> <20070510000608.319c2326@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <200705100931.42813.alan@linuxholdings.co.za> <20070510092445.16cfc9b1@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <3103632.vvIsoWeEWl@kn.gn.rtr.message-center.info> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2cvs4 (GTK+ 2.10.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_C626XbcFNexuu5EqwrNK9Al; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 361aa55a-90c8-444e-97be-4a7bbb3911fc X-Archives-Hash: efe6b803e3e8c238da8a7c2eaaf10eac --Sig_C626XbcFNexuu5EqwrNK9Al Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:41:04 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > It is faster. =20 >=20 > Hm. I don't understand. Why is portage in a sparse file of, let's say,=20 > 400m, with reiserfs and notail mounted, faster, then a real partition > of 400m with reiserfs and notail? No idea, but I tried it when I encountered that page and portage operations were measurably faster. --=20 Neil Bothwick If you got the words it does not mean you got the knowledge. --Sig_C626XbcFNexuu5EqwrNK9Al Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGQuiDum4al0N1GQMRAlM8AKCuh6IT95YyJQQhCaaj9h/40+5gkQCeLj2L +3Mi06LPTS/oPgw2d5FJsL8= =S8/r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_C626XbcFNexuu5EqwrNK9Al-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list