On Thu, 10 May 2007 00:21:06 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:

> > You could also argue that /usr needs the least protection from
> > filesystem damage, because it contains no data. /usr can be repaired
> > with a reinstall, unlike /var, /home or /etc.

> That's a good point.
> 
> Only for the sake of arguing: those need no FS protection, but
> recent back-ups :)

Recent is never recent enough. I used to think daily backups were fine,
until a failure at 5pm cost me a day's work :(


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Forget the Joneses...I can't keep up with The Simpsons.