From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HlWMs-0006I2-CY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 20:33:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l48KVrfC026619; Tue, 8 May 2007 20:31:53 GMT Received: from mxfep03.bredband.com (mxfep03.bredband.com [195.54.107.76]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l48KRZto021961 for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 20:27:35 GMT Received: from ironport.bredband.com ([195.54.107.82] [195.54.107.82]) by mxfep03.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20070508202734.MOVZ23113.mxfep03.bredband.com@ironport.bredband.com> for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 22:27:34 +0200 Received: from c-c0f5e055.104-1-64736c15.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO hest.homelinux.org) ([85.224.245.192]) by ironport.bredband.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 08 May 2007 22:27:34 +0200 From: Naga Toro To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Packages that do not compile. Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:27:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <463F65E4.2090403@ergolight-sw.com> <200705082008.11051.nagatoro@gmail.com> <4640920B.8080509@ergolight-sw.com> In-Reply-To: <4640920B.8080509@ergolight-sw.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705082227.32312.nagatoro@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 4537eb7a-6101-425c-8e41-87c6ec8ea1d6 X-Archives-Hash: 0832b7ed35fee209ed7858d64f02159c On Tuesday 08 May 2007 17.06.51 David Harel wrote: > Naga Toro wrote: > > Second, as stated just above that passage, it is not nessecary but > > recommended. > > Here is a quotation from the doc: > > To be completely safe that your system is in a sane state, you must > rebuild the toolchain and then world to make use of the new compiler. > > (Now how do I make the word MUST above underlined and bold?) ;-) _underline_ *bold* usualy workes fine :) But still atleast I interpret that as "should work without, but better safe then sorry". But then later in the same doc it says: "If you upgrade from gcc 3.3 to 4.1, do not use the method based on revdep-rebuild, but do a complete system rebuild." so the answer to your question would be either stay with 3.3.6 and rebuild those packages that you emerged with 4.1.1 or upgrade to 4.1.1 and rebuild system + world (ccache is highly recomended). -- Naga -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list