From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkL0O-0002yx-BH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 14:13:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45EBAVT026530; Sat, 5 May 2007 14:11:10 GMT Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45E4K45015819 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 14:04:21 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EA31C212 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 14:04:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xtzJk4kKj0J1 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 14:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net (adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8781C0A3 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 14:04:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wesnoth version Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:04:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <9238e8de0705050640o3de68d0ub4bd8184d05b9a74@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9238e8de0705050640o3de68d0ub4bd8184d05b9a74@mail.gmail.com> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2216160.Ji0viImWVs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705050904.19325.bss03@volumehost.net> X-Archives-Salt: 9c3b341b-8d30-4d86-a39f-1d5c91204282 X-Archives-Hash: db333c1dd090b59aeaa6c5a02aa3efc7 --nextPart2216160.Ji0viImWVs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 05 May 2007, "Marko Koci=C4=87" wrote=20 about '[gentoo-user] Wesnoth version': > Is there a specific reason why gentoo doesn't provide development > versions of Battle for Wesnoth (games-strategy/wesnoth)? > > I couldn't find anything in bug database. Development versions (1.3.2) > are pretty stable, so I can't see a reason why are not included in > "~x86". As for "x86", 1.2.4 (latest stable) seems ok. > > Should I open a bug for that? Yeah, a new numbered release deserves it's own ebuild, even if it has to=20 linger in package.mask. Make sure it's been 2-3 days after the release=20 and then file a version bump bug. Please report if "simply renaming" the=20 existing ebuild works and/or what you had to change to get a clean=20 compile/install. If you follow Wesnoth closely, but aren't part of upstream, you might=20 consider becoming a/the gentoo package maintainer for it. IIRC, IMHO, the= =20 packaging for Wesnoth could use a little "love". =2D-=20 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,=3D ,-_-. =3D.=20 bss03@volumehost.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'=20 http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ =20 --nextPart2216160.Ji0viImWVs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGPI7j55pqL7G1QFkRAjnvAJ0Rd3w4vxmgvUFRUS1uro1bCzv3hgCdF/mn Qy5MvHTE9cFxO79hvPYn55I= =UXnv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2216160.Ji0viImWVs-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list