From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HiYQ2-00002y-Gb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:08:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3UG6o2K032231; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:06:50 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3UG1oOW025893 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:01:50 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 59B9B206B4A for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A003206B44 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de (account wevah [139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTPSA id 22364445 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:50 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <41055.15909.qm@web31715.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200704301724.06854.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <1177947707.18715.7.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1177947707.18715.7.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704301801.49069.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: cf97acd8-6486-430d-9af7-67589eaedd10 X-Archives-Hash: a95f778794826b72dcc2c48458fcd704 On Montag, 30. April 2007, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: > > Nope, Unix sockets are usually not the commonly chosen way for > kernel<->userland communication. They're used for machine-local (w/ > exception of clusters) inter-process communication. But I think that > init would struggle w/o CONFIG_UNIX and, of course, udev. So Maxim might > have hit problems there. But that's just nitpicking here ;-) you forgot X. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list