From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HesyP-0004CH-FF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:16:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3KDFEPn029895; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:15:14 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3KDAf3O024754 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:10:41 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so814452ugc for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:10:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=ipXknUUgPCwc6yLr38loIxz9MsAPsszCUZjEjv75rbXl0jlOg7slTVOQxfcUve+pp4zxytJXkFURff6pjq8dTnPjH7WDEVmE89/pgEZHpne4elAUI0vRsTxZp9uf7RJpqahk+WdvL9v4CvHpogpNcXdKzzhNsg0H2dK/BXJ7byY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=BE6GK06vqTLSqo/rdg7O3IWADK/o3hZznKkA7AiO0hwXZtrzIUS2bzAc5JO193CSvXHSkTkS59cTTZ503AH7VQe6Rlv7UwduRnJc03m2Xly1eIqMa2HNw92tTiw4XnGsW+hy0GWKmiBHmMUR0WiaOeB0kz8e8ek9kJU8vEsZSmc= Received: by 10.66.232.10 with SMTP id e10mr2827289ugh.1177074641030; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.study ( [213.162.120.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g30sm6583392ugd.2007.04.20.06.10.40; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:10:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Understanding sshd response Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:10:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200704201208.21206.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20070420133051.010d52bb.hilse@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20070420133051.010d52bb.hilse@web.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1841444.SimlMoHNjI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704201410.24610.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: a553f242-ab91-42b1-bd22-b781cb696080 X-Archives-Hash: 3880230f92f0fbe87f992f720b77488b --nextPart1841444.SimlMoHNjI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 20 April 2007 12:30, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:08:03 +0100 Mick > > wrote: > > What does this mean? > > > > " Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version > > RomCliSecure_4.12 debug1: no match: RomCliSecure_4.12 " > > That's in compat.c, l.58ff. (4.6pl1). There's a table with > server/application specific quirks. As it's written in the debug > output: There's no match for your SSH server's ID string. > > As always, debug messages tend to be only understandable if you know a > bit of the application's code. Thanks HWH, So there's nothing that I would need to do client wise to make my gentoo bo= x=20 communicate 'better' with the server? This is almost a rhetorical question= ,=20 because I am not sure I can define 'better'. I just ask to see if there is= =20 any setting client-wise that will improve compatibility. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1841444.SimlMoHNjI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGKLvA5Fp0QerLYPcRAp1rAJ0Us2V4kU5yTg94eka642EYgko50ACfXsrI 3pxhP8ECH4MGV0ZKDOhS/lk= =S/oT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1841444.SimlMoHNjI-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list