From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HZrNu-0000RM-MU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:33:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l36GWknp013283; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:32:46 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l36GSgQN008670 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:28:42 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1278414ugc for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=eS47roaO3W6Ty5g5hseiHrPV4mGW+kdez87LqCoUvcvhaBzgmURelvejJW/sqGX5zbOuheGiEcN2gxkuEUGViVHSVVaAJA6OhjpyDD0lrOWowrCN/OUuQA4fke7QCzhhR5zsZC72JOyEOfXnyFLL2aib50QFe2N4qfMwmowrV3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=cNBo3CwcX93tF7eCr6TChMK7Lh+jdTP8iyzdZ8lLnhLffydyKp8qMB1yVoQ4XGCHGwImmxnytHwTIhgsIo+yFW3wI3NSu/0lNxAU5s2tVOMaJsjdk7kjS28o9RTJ2dR18IslMvKDV/I2PHioTA0nXByDLoqPVLgF2Aleye1D4Aw= Received: by 10.66.248.5 with SMTP id v5mr3099783ugh.1175876922154; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lappy.study ( [213.162.120.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1sm5230220ugf.2007.04.06.09.28.41; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:28:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Why are gentoo people so in love =?iso-8859-1?q?with=09colorized?= output?!? Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:28:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070404041739.GA15293@crowfix.com> <20070404160017.GC10689@crowfix.com> <46141A5B.5000109@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46141A5B.5000109@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1716741.zuesJZGpJn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704061728.26159.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 9f7a99f1-1aff-48ae-b6d8-2ba404d6961d X-Archives-Hash: 12cffa83c9e9ec39421ea3c35c8ee5b0 --nextPart1716741.zuesJZGpJn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 04 April 2007 22:36, b.n. wrote: > *slap on the forehead* Oh my god, now I understand it all. You are using > a WHITE xterm background. > > The Gentoo colours make complete sense on a BLACK background. I do agree > that they are insane on a white or otherwise light background. > > I was thinking you were quite mad :) ,however now I agree with your > point (even if I don't agree with your ranting attitude: as repeated a > TON of times, your options are 1)file bugs 2)become a gentoo dev 3)stop > using Gentoo). or, 4)switch to a black background? What-ever floats you boat. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1716741.zuesJZGpJn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGFnUq5Fp0QerLYPcRApiiAKCYjdDjF1qkLCCiG9UArnETf/AXswCbBc7x JEXmgPX07ijFCH2hb2qqtBw= =ZJp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1716741.zuesJZGpJn-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list