From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HYEl9-0002LZ-FT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 05:07:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l32560vW003114; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:06:00 GMT Received: from mailout1.igs.net (mailout1.igs.net [216.58.97.34]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3251bmg030685 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 05:01:37 GMT Received: from waltdnes.org (i209-195-113-231.cia.com [209.195.113.231]) by mailout1.igs.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 861186A8C for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:00:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 01:02:32 -0400 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 01:02:32 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels? Message-ID: <20070402050232.GA1761@waltdnes.org> References: <20070331055510.GA29960@waltdnes.org> <20070331092122.3d47cc07@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070331092122.3d47cc07@hactar.digimed.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: 9663caa5-cb8d-4e58-bc27-0949a2a3dbb5 X-Archives-Hash: 4908a527f857116862828276835e123b On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 09:21:22AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote > At around 300MB per kernel, that's ten excess kernels, so you can't be > doing it that often. I ran df and ll between each individual unmerge. The individual kernels take approx 250 megs, freshly emerged. Compiling generates another 200 megs worth of object code, etc. Here's partial output of "ll" before the cleanup. Note that 2.6.16-r7, 2.6.17-r7, and 2.6.18-r3 were compiled, as well as the current 2.6.19-r5. drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 Sep 6 2006 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r13 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 May 4 2006 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r6 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1488 Oct 14 02:14 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r7 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 Jun 13 2006 linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r9 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Jul 29 2006 linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r4 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1448 Sep 6 2006 linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r7 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 744 Sep 16 2006 linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r8 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Nov 12 09:01 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r2 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Feb 17 18:51 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r3 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Dec 24 22:14 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r5 drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 712 Jan 14 20:15 linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r6 drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 1328 Mar 8 19:32 linux-2.6.19-gentoo-r5 I don't mind the 30 or 40 megs for the source tarball+patches in my distfiles directory. But the quarter gig for each minor "r" bump, most of which I never build, is a bit much. -- Walter Dnes In linux /sbin/init is Job #1 Q. Mr. Ghandi, what do you think of Microsoft security? A. I think it would be a good idea. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list