public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels?
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:06:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703311306.41422.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703310505.33944.bss03@volumehost.net>

On Samstag, 31. März 2007, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Saturday 31 March 2007 00:55:10 Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Having gotten rather tired of doing this
> > manually... again... I went into /etc/portage/package.mask and added
> >
> > >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5
> >
> >   It won't hurt me now, but is there anything that might depend on newer
> > kernels?  It's assumed I'll upgrade when required by a security alert.
> > Other than that, how long can I get away between kernel upgrades?
>
> Just watch your GLSAs, and you should be fine.  If a package depends on a
> certain kernel version, it will list that in it's depend line, and emerge
> will complain that it can't satisfy that dependency.

Well, there are many security related kernel bugs (just read the Changelogs of 
the .18, .19 and .20 'stable' releases), but hardly any kernel GLSAs. It 
looks like kernels are not covered by GLSAs.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-31 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-31  5:55 [gentoo-user] Any consequences to package.mask'ing newer kernels? Walter Dnes
2007-03-31  8:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-02  5:02   ` Walter Dnes
2007-04-02  8:37     ` Neil Bothwick
2007-03-31 10:05 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-03-31 11:06   ` Hemmann, Volker Armin [this message]
2007-03-31 11:03 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-03-31 16:05   ` b.n.
2007-03-31 14:11     ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-04-01 14:21       ` b.n.
2007-04-01 12:48         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-04-01 22:51           ` b.n.
2007-04-01 21:35             ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-04-01 22:21               ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-02  5:35       ` Walter Dnes
2007-04-02  8:38         ` Neil Bothwick
     [not found] ` <200704130133.49396.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
     [not found]   ` <20070413005947.27416382@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
2007-04-13  0:11     ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-04-13  7:40       ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-16 13:00         ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-16 13:06           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-04-16 13:48             ` Neil Bothwick
2007-04-13 22:49     ` Anthony E. Caudel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703311306.41422.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
    --to=volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox